Ice agents are furious that Hilton Hotel denied them housing while they are detaining people peacefully protesting.

I mean if you're going to act like private police and be doing all that, expect that kind of treatment. Most people hate them and at the end of the day, no one can force you to not be a piece of crap. You are entitled to be whatever you want, but I don't know how hard it is to understand that the consequences of being horrible to others is that yeah, you are going to get that kind of treatment. I don't know what deluded them into thinking everyone is going to love them and it will be the same. It's like an abuser who hits you repeatedly or verbally abuses you and then can't understand why you didn't invite them over for the holidays.

Like are you fkking stupid?

[media=https://youtu.be/1oZC2CW2y9Q?si=daKGE7XZnZ9u8yE-]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

They expect double standards. For years Republicans relied on the fact that a business has the right to refuse service.

Now that it affects them they don't like it. 🤷🏻‍♂

SatanBurger · 36-40, F

@DeWayfarer I think it's funny because I used to say that businesses shouldn't discriminate especially since the goal is about money and customers so it never made sense why people deny gay people.

But now I'm thinking about it, we have a fascist govt I think it's great 👍

Kinda weird how it turns like that, never thought I'd be arguing for business discrimination practices but this type seems logical. If I was a business, I wouldn't want ice who has been a private police force basically to be around the other patrons, for my customers own safety.

Ice has been arresting people for protesting and we're talking about very peaceful, no fighting so in reality it's about safety at this point. Ice and law enforcement aren't to be trusted and who would want them to harass your customers anyways

SatanBurger · 36-40, F

@DeWayfarer Hilton has caved since apparently punishing the hotel for refusing service citing that the hotel is a welcoming place for domestic terrorists.

[media=https://youtube.com/shorts/F_OFENDUFjQ?si=1WND7odf_hCJk6Bl]

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@SatanBurger Not really. While Hilton itself has caved in, the Hampton Inn in Minnesota apparently has refused still, hence removal of the Hilton franchise.

Basically what that means that Hampton Inn can not be a franchise of Hilton. It's actually a minor loss to Hilton and a tremendous gain for the Hampton inn, since they don't have to cowtow around Hilton's corporate policies.

I really don't like this concept of one corporation owning another corporation. Even if it's limited by a franchise.

It's sort of like slavery for corporations.

SatanBurger · 36-40, F

@DeWayfarer Oh yeah I agree about slavery for corporations and thanks I didn't know that before.