I think CNBC is getting a little over the top on the propaganda. Shouldn't the secret service be doing something about this?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
The piece doesn't suggest that.
Cierzo · M
@Supersymmetry: What does it suggest then?
SW-User
@Cierzo: go read the piece
Cierzo · M
@Supersymmetry: The piece does not suggest that, fine.
But when CNBC chooses that way to frame it in a twitter messages, aren't they aware of how triggering and irresponsible it is to do it with the US so divided?
But when CNBC chooses that way to frame it in a twitter messages, aren't they aware of how triggering and irresponsible it is to do it with the US so divided?
SW-User
@Cierzo: the most important thing in the piece is the slug line - opinion piece.
I guess it's too much to ask that people read these days.
Yes, the tone here is awful,
That doesn't excuse us from being an informed electorate.
When The fairness doctrine was struck down, it allowed people to cocoon up in their own views
I guess it's too much to ask that people read these days.
Yes, the tone here is awful,
That doesn't excuse us from being an informed electorate.
When The fairness doctrine was struck down, it allowed people to cocoon up in their own views
Cierzo · M
@Supersymmetry: Agree, but isn't it a vicious circle? We may not read,but the fact that media do not provide accurate information any more, but just try to create opinion, doesn't it deter people from reading?