This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Never had a doubt the house would switch, and why more focus on the Senate MUST BE DONE!
Impeachment Trump himself has survived TWICE, because little focus was made on the Senate in his first term.
When you finally understand that that most of the MAGA are fanatics. Then you might understand the importance of the Senate.
It takes a ⅔rds majority Conviction in the Senate for a conviction to stick.
Impeachment Trump himself has survived TWICE, because little focus was made on the Senate in his first term.
When you finally understand that that most of the MAGA are fanatics. Then you might understand the importance of the Senate.
It takes a ⅔rds majority Conviction in the Senate for a conviction to stick.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@DeWayfarer
We've been over this.
So, which FOUR Republican-held seats do you think are the most likely to flip with that "focus"? (or five if Democrat Sen. Ossoff loses re-election in Georgia)
These are the Republican-held U.S. Senate seats up for election in 2026:
Capito, Shelley Moore (R-WV)
Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
Collins, Susan M. (R-ME)
Cornyn, John (R-TX)
Cotton, Tom (R-AR)
Daines, Steve (R-MT)
Ernst, Joni (R-IA) *
Graham, Lindsey (R-SC)
Hagerty, Bill (R-TN)
Hyde-Smith, Cindy (R-MS)
Lummis, Cynthia M. (R-WY)
Marshall, Roger (R-KS)
McConnell, Mitch (R-KY) *
Mullin, Markwayne (R-OK)
Ricketts, Pete (R-NE)
Risch, James E. (R-ID)
Rounds, Mike (R-SD)
Sullivan, Dan (R-AK)
Tillis, Thom (R-NC) *
Tuberville, Tommy (R-AL)
* announced not running for re-election.
We've been over this.
So, which FOUR Republican-held seats do you think are the most likely to flip with that "focus"? (or five if Democrat Sen. Ossoff loses re-election in Georgia)
These are the Republican-held U.S. Senate seats up for election in 2026:
Capito, Shelley Moore (R-WV)
Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
Collins, Susan M. (R-ME)
Cornyn, John (R-TX)
Cotton, Tom (R-AR)
Daines, Steve (R-MT)
Ernst, Joni (R-IA) *
Graham, Lindsey (R-SC)
Hagerty, Bill (R-TN)
Hyde-Smith, Cindy (R-MS)
Lummis, Cynthia M. (R-WY)
Marshall, Roger (R-KS)
McConnell, Mitch (R-KY) *
Mullin, Markwayne (R-OK)
Ricketts, Pete (R-NE)
Risch, James E. (R-ID)
Rounds, Mike (R-SD)
Sullivan, Dan (R-AK)
Tillis, Thom (R-NC) *
Tuberville, Tommy (R-AL)
* announced not running for re-election.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@beckyromero ALL of them needed to be worked on MONTHS AGO.
The house normally switches parties during the midterms anyway.
Why Trump was impeached TWICE, yet not convicted. Trump was counting on that then and counting on that NOW.
The house normally switches parties during the midterms anyway.
Why Trump was impeached TWICE, yet not convicted. Trump was counting on that then and counting on that NOW.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@beckyromero we can only hope that the inability to save millions of citizens from seeing their medical insurance skyrocket may help defeat enough republicans to make another impeachment old and for Dozing Don to be the first president ever removed from office.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@DeWayfarer
So, you think ALL 20 of those GOP seats could be won - but you can't name me just the four you think would be most likely?
So, you think ALL 20 of those GOP seats could be won - but you can't name me just the four you think would be most likely?
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@beckyromero I refuse to go down that specifics road.
Most elections are unpredictable. Work on all of them is the only reasonable way.
And that's exactly how the house is won.
Most elections are unpredictable. Work on all of them is the only reasonable way.
And that's exactly how the house is won.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@DeWayfarer
Well, that is NOT how the House will be won. You don't waste resources against incumbants who consistently win their seats by 30 or 40 points.
Well, that is NOT how the House will be won. You don't waste resources against incumbants who consistently win their seats by 30 or 40 points.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@beckyromero It's called the nibble principle!
IT WORKS.
Heck ChatGPT is constantly recommending it to me, in multiple ways.
You remind me of that video, you posted, about how the Russians couldn't understand how the USA won the Iraq war.
They couldn't understand how the USA could wipe out their whole strategy.
You don't invest and rely in only a few areas. You invest in the broad spectrum of areas.
IT WORKS.
Heck ChatGPT is constantly recommending it to me, in multiple ways.
You remind me of that video, you posted, about how the Russians couldn't understand how the USA won the Iraq war.
They couldn't understand how the USA could wipe out their whole strategy.
You don't invest and rely in only a few areas. You invest in the broad spectrum of areas.
jackjjackson · M
Anyone believing the dims may flip the Senate is delusional. Heck, The clown car they’re driving might be the exception and fail to flip the house

@DeWayfarer @beckyromero @samueltyler2

@DeWayfarer @beckyromero @samueltyler2
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@jackjjackson All the more reason to try.
Trump needs to be convicted! And even sentenced.
Treason would be a good one to start with. Violation of the oath of office by not defending the constitution another one.
Trump needs to be convicted! And even sentenced.
Treason would be a good one to start with. Violation of the oath of office by not defending the constitution another one.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@jackjjackson
In 2026? That's a tall order.
By 2028? Don't bet against it - unless Trump unconstitutionally cancels the election.
In 2026? That's a tall order.
By 2028? Don't bet against it - unless Trump unconstitutionally cancels the election.
jackjjackson · M
2028 commie candidates won’t get enough votes @beckyromero
jackjjackson · M
Every day is opposite of reality day. Must be challenging 🤣😂🤣 @DeWayfarer
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@jackjjackson Since when have I ever talked about one issue every day?
@beckyromero's reference to me was a few weeks ago, if not months ago.
In fact it's been a different issue almost every day for most Democrats.
Your reality is in serious need of checking, just by that one fact.
@beckyromero's reference to me was a few weeks ago, if not months ago.
In fact it's been a different issue almost every day for most Democrats.
Your reality is in serious need of checking, just by that one fact.
jackjjackson · M
Did you believe Trump would win in 2024? @DeWayfarer
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@jackjjackson yes, I told everyone he would win in 2016 and 2024. I prayed I would be wrong, but i saw the handwriting on the walls. He was allowed to gaslight the nation.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@jackjjackson Pretty much everyone knew it was close. Regardless of party. Even you knew that. Neither side even got 50% of the common vote.
There was no mandate for either one. And why I have always said this is not a democracy. The electorial college needs to go, for it to even be a democracy.
There was no mandate for either one. And why I have always said this is not a democracy. The electorial college needs to go, for it to even be a democracy.
jackjjackson · M
🙄 @DeWayfarer






