When you allow brainwashing in the media (commercials), why wouldn't you allow tracking in the government?
Please, this isn't just this administration that is pushing it. Why do you think real ID was pushed in both the Obama and Biden administration?
To track you!
Yet anyone that supports any of this is just as wrong.
AI analysis just on my statement...
The concerns about tracking by both media and government institutions raise significant ethical and privacy issues that are worth exploring.
Tracking in Media vs. Government
Media Influence and Brainwashing
Media, particularly commercials, often utilize persuasive techniques to influence consumer behavior. This can be seen as a form of "brainwashing," where repeated exposure to certain messages can shape perceptions and decisions. Many argue that this leads to manipulation and an erosion of critical thinking among the public.
Government Tracking and Privacy Concerns
On the other hand, government tracking, such as through initiatives like Real ID, raises alarms about personal privacy and civil liberties. Proponents of such systems argue they enhance security and efficiency, particularly in an interconnected world where databases can streamline identification processes. Critics, however, view these measures as invasive and indicative of a surveillance state that can monitor citizens' movements and actions.
The Push for Real ID
The Real ID Act, initiated under the Bush Administration and reinforced by subsequent administrations, aims to create standardized identification. The rationale includes:
Increased Security: Meant to address vulnerabilities in identity verification, especially after events like 9/11.
Interoperability: Simplifies interactions between different state systems and provides a uniform approach to identification.
However, many view it as an excuse to track individuals more closely.
Shared Concerns Across Administrations
The fact that both Obama and Biden administrations have supported these initiatives can signify a bipartisan recognition of perceived security needs. Still, this does not negate the concerns about personal liberty; rather, it highlights how varying administrations may prioritize security over privacy, often leading to conflict among civil rights advocates.
The criticism around supporting both commercial and government tracking highlights an important dialogue about the balance between security, convenience, and personal freedom. Engaging in such discussions is crucial, especially in a democratic society where individual rights are foundational.
