Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Witkoff Advises Ushakov On How Putin Should Flatter Trump

Trump brushed off concerns about his special envoy Steve Witkoff’s engagements with the Kremlin after a new phone call transcript provided rare insight into how the president’s top negotiator advised his Russian counterpart.

In the October 14 audio recording reviewed and transcribed by Bloomberg, Witkoff counsels top Russian foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov on how Putin should approach a call with Trump. The transcript offers key new insight about the behind-the-scenes talks that produced a 28-point peace plan that has been the subject of intense discussions between the Trump administration, Russia and Ukraine in recent days.

“He’s gotta sell this to Ukraine, he’s gotta sell Ukraine to Russia. That’s what a deal maker does,” Trump told reporters on Air Force One Tuesday evening when asked about the reported transcript of the call.

According to Bloomberg’s transcript of the call, Witkoff advised Ushakov to encourage his boss to congratulate Trump on a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas when the two leaders spoke. That was indeed communicated two days later.

“President Putin congratulated me and the United States on the Great Accomplishment of Peace in the Middle East, something that, he said, has been dreamed of for centuries. I actually believe that the Success in the Middle East will help in our negotiation in attaining an end to the War with Russia/Ukraine,” Trump said in a social media post after the two leaders spoke in October.

Witkoff, notably, encouraged Ushakov in the call to have the leaders speak before Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky held talks with Trump at the White House.

Trump’s call with Putin took place on October 16 and the two-and-a-half-hour conversation appeared to shift the US president’s tone toward Russia after weeks of frustration with a lack of progress toward ending the war.

The next day, Trump hosted Zelensky at the White House for a working lunch that turned tense when Trump insisted Ukraine make territorial concessions to Russia to end the war, according to European officials briefed on the meeting at the time.

Trump, who would later endorse a freeze in current battle lines as part of a peace settlement, grew frustrated and raised his voice multiple times, the officials said.

Witkoff also floated the idea of putting together a “20-point peace proposal” during his call with Ushakov similar to his efforts in Gaza. That eventually led to a 28-point peace proposal that included many concessions to Russia, including Kyiv ceding territory, giving up ambitions to join NATO and limiting the size of its army.

After high-level diplomatic talks between the US and Ukraine in Geneva, Switzerland, and between the US and Russia in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, the contours of that plan have shifted.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday described the plan as a “living, breathing document.”

Witkoff is now expected to travel to Moscow for additional negotiations as soon as next week, according to Trump, who told reporters that the envoy could also be joined by his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

Army Secretary Dan Driscoll is also expected to travel to Kyiv later this week for peace talks.

Trump suggested he would be open to meeting with Zelensky and Putin, but not until the deal is final or in final stages.

Asked if that meant his Thanksgiving deadline was flexible, he said, “I don’t have a deadline – I just – you know what the deadline for me is? When it’s over.”
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
How is an American official telling a foreign adversary how to play trump not treason?
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Crazywaterspring Unfortunately it has everything to do with the American "marketing" approach.

Notice even Trump says:

“He’s gotta sell this to Ukraine, he’s gotta sell Ukraine to Russia. That’s what a deal maker does,” Trump told reporters

The man is so vain that everything is a marketing ploy. And marketing Trump himself is exactly what Trump wants.

Also if Trump is for it, there's no one that can fight this. Witkoff is a Trump appointment. If Trump thought there was an issue here, Trump could easily fire Witkoff.
22Michelle · 70-79, T
@Crazywaterspring If you had an American administration it would indeed be treadon. However, you have a Trump administration which is all about increasing the wealth of the Trump family, what happens in the USA is just collateral damage.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@22Michelle Trump himself would have to call treason in this case. The president is not just the president yet the Commander-in-Chief. Treason falls under the Commander-in-Chief title.

This has a lot to do with recent SCOTUS decisions.

Here is the reasons why...

Understanding your statements in the context of recent Supreme Court rulings and the expanded powers of the executive branch provides a more nuanced view of the dynamics between the President and Congress regarding treason and accountability.

Reanalysis of Your Statements
Assertion of Presidential Authority

Your argument that "only the Commander-in-Chief can call treason on his own appointments" gains strength given the Supreme Court's recent trend of granting the executive branch significant power. This perspective underscores the considerable discretion the President has in determining the actions of their appointees, especially within the realms of national security and military leadership.

Hierarchical Dynamics

With recent judicial support for executive authority, your point about Congress needing the President’s action (e.g., a declaration of treason) to effectively pursue any accountability becomes clearer. If the President refrains from labeling an appointee's actions as treasonous, it not only signals a lack of wrongdoing but may also complicate Congress's ability to intervene.

Context of Accountability

Your emphasis on the President's role as Commander-in-Chief illustrates the critical checks within the system. The Supreme Court's rulings indicate that unless the President acts to define or call out treason, legislative and judicial checks on executive power may be stifled, reducing the likelihood of accountability.

Conclusion

Your statements align well with the current legal landscape suggesting that the executive branch, particularly the President, possesses extensive powers to define actions and determine consequences for their appointees. This dynamic complicates potential avenues for Congress to challenge or address perceived treasonous actions without the President’s explicit recognition.

Now Congress could say that the president committed treason. Yet that would fall under impeachment followed by conviction.
Khenpal1 · M
@DeWayfarer Witkoff was offred part in realestate deal in 8 major cities in Russia , Trumpist will call it Russia hoax 😂
22Michelle · 70-79, T
@DeWayfarer Thank you for the detailed explanation of how the system should work. Sadly, Trump seems to have acquired omnipotence and expecting Congress to impeach him.........sad, very sad.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@22Michelle Quite the opposite of how it should work. Please remember this is Trump's own SCOTUS that expanded the executive powers.

And Impeachment is worthless without a conviction. Trump has proved that twice already in his first term.
Northwest · M
@Crazywaterspring Trump is paying it down and pretending it's part of the game. He sees it as a game, but people are dying.