Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The Art of Letting Trump Claim a Win, While Walking Away Stronger

When Xi Jinping walked out of his meeting with President Trump on Thursday, he projected the confidence of a powerful leader who could make Washington blink.

The outcome of the talks suggested that he succeeded.

By flexing China’s near monopoly on rare earths and its purchasing power over U.S. soybeans, Mr. Xi won key concessions from Washington — a reduction in tariffs, a suspension of port fees on Chinese ships and the delay of U.S. export controls that would have barred more Chinese firms from accessing American technology. Both sides also agreed to extend a truce struck earlier this year to limit tariffs.

“What’s clear is they have become increasingly bold in exerting leverage and they are happy to pocket any and all U.S. concessions,” said Julian Gewirtz, who was a senior China policy official at the White House and the State Department in President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s administration.

Sounding almost like he was delivering a lecture, Mr. Xi said to Mr. Trump that the “recent twists and turns” of the trade war should be instructive to them both, according to a Chinese government summary of Mr. Xi’s remarks at the meeting in Busan, South Korea.
“Both sides should consider the bigger picture and focus on the long-term benefits of cooperation, rather than falling into a vicious cycle of mutual retaliation,” Mr. Xi said.

Mr. Xi’s message seemed to be: Beijing had proven its capacity to hit back and Washington would do well to remember it.
Top | New | Old
ArishMell · 70-79, M
A sobering analysis.

I think a point that we in the "West" tend to miss is that the People's Republic of China is run by a cohesive, ruthless, single-Party government of dogmatists and technocrats whose President is basically a caretaker for the time being (life, basically).

It also seems supported by a very skilled civil-service and internal "security" services, which although not independent and having to toe the Party line, are not forever having to consider how that line may go a few years hence. Any change will be in detail, not overall ideology.

This means the Beijing government can plan a long way ahead, and can analyse and sometimes outwit any democratic American or European national government that changes every few years at the behest of its own citizens.

Donald Trump is very naive and often clumsy in international diplomacy, but he is not the whole story by any means. The People's Republic of China had been manging a carefully planned strategy for a long time, and coping with whoever happens to be President of the USA at any given time, is a comparatively simple matter of adjustments along the road... or Belt and Road.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
I mean the US did collectively say they didn't want power anymore. Voting for Trump means a weaker nation. I mean no food stamps so people gonna be robbing others so high crime rates, almost no one is getting hired at other jobs, lack of medical care, lack of a living wage, almost no infrastructure now and no tourism. No immigrants means lack of everything. Undocumented alone contributed to 90 billion yearly, now we lost that.

Now Trump gives half of the US money to ICE and some extra, they are now more funded than some small countries. But somehow people aren't upset at that but upset at a small number of programs aimed at undocumented people or refugees which are less than what we give to ice.

So basically in short, the US has collectively said that they give up and don't care. We can't expect other countries not to rise to the occasion and if I was a country I'd do the same.
Carla · 61-69, F
Because he is a dangerous man, illusions of a win seems a good strategy.
I am bummed that he didn't leave feeling as though he was thoroughly defeated. He needs that in his life.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
Yes. Running the numbers. China takes the Gold. America gets an "I ran in a race" award..😷
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@ArishMell Well thought out and presented.. If you dig into the history of events, there are a number of parallels between China and the US itself at an economic and development level. China is now the industrial powerhouse that America became just after WW2. With a global reach and a hand in every pocket financially . And it is using its influence to sway lesser nations. There are differences of course..So one cant draw the conclusion that China will be the next superpower unchallenged. But I think we can safely say Americas sun was setting, even without the trainwreck that is trump..😷
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@whowasthatmaskedman Thankyou!

I think China and the USA both face some stiff competition from elsewhere industrially, but probably China has the upper hand politically over much of the world now.

Russia might have become that, after the collapse of the USSR, but not under President Putin because he is more interested in regaining his country's former empire than building Russia herself. By my analysis such that it is, the country was likely badly damaged by the "oligarchs" too, taking too much for themselves. Putin originally helped them, and they helped him, but only while they were useful to him.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@ArishMell I agree. Russia was a military threat (and still is to some extent) But it was never a real economic threat to the west. it would have to co opt power politically first..But oligarchies can spring from anywhere, once the money has corrupted the right people. And there we are back at America..😷
MoveAlong · 70-79, M
Xi just took Trump's lunch money and gave him a wedgie in front of the entire world.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment