Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The tragic change a single year has made in America.

One year ago, everything was so different. In late October 2024, before the US presidential election, thoughtful Americans could certainly acknowledge the deep flaws of their country – its injustices and inequality – but they could still recognize it as the United States. A democracy. A place where the rule of law meant something. A nation led by a dignified and decent public servant, despite his advanced age and increasing frailty.

These days, in late October 2025, many of us barely recognize the nation we live in. People suspected of being illegal immigrants are rounded up and shoved into vans, sometimes denied due process. The East Wing of the “people’s house” – the White House – is being destroyed for an obscene ballroom. Donald Trump is persecuting his political rivals or supposed enemies and demanding the justice department hand over $230m. Armed military personnel are being sent into American cities on false pretexts.

The Pentagon, relabeled the Department of War, has – in effect – rid itself of day-to-day journalistic scrutiny as it spends what could amount to nearly $1tn of taxpayer money. Universities, law firms, news companies are buckling under the president’s threats, and billionaires are treated like members of the royal family.

“The United States, just months before its 250th birthday as the world’s leading democracy, has tipped over the edge into authoritarianism and fascism,” Garrett Graff, the American historian and author, wrote in August. “In the end, faster than I imagined possible, it did happen here.”

Sorry, but this is fact, MAGATs
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
GerOttman · 70-79, M
H.R.2202 - 104th Congress (1995-1996): Immigration Control and Financial Responsibility Act of 1996 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress https://share.google/3VRRn6oZnydfkl243

1996 Bill Clinton. Not Trump...
@GerOttman Still pretending Trump's fascism is Bill Clinton's fault. You guys keep going further and further back to blame everyone else.

By next year it will be George Washington's fault at this rate.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Avectoijesuismoi · 36-40
@GerOttman true and something needs to be done to solve a crisis, immigration is not entirely bad you always need some manpower and skills coming as long as it is done through proper channels. What nobody needs is uncontrolled illegal immigration it is bad from every angle. You don't know what you are letting in, and equally even if the person is a god fearing hard working honest person they are open to being exploited poorly paid and poorly treated as they have no protection of the laws in the country
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow wasn’t that the whole premise behind removing statues of old leaders ? (It was their fault )
@AthrillatheHunt Ummm no. Most of those statues went up during the civil rights era by racists using treasonous "history" as a display of power over black Americans.

" Know your place" cast in bronze.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow yea you’re right totally racist hahaha but seriously , Columbus has had a statue in his honor in NYC since the 1700’s dude
@AthrillatheHunt NYC has been a colony of 2 European empires too. So what? Random trivia doesn't matter.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow the Dutch were traders, not empire builders.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow they built merchant trade routes , not military empires (more like Phoenicia than Carthage )
@AthrillatheHunt That is factually a lie.

Literally every European empire created trade routes.

Again the Dutch just couldn't hold their empire because they sucked at warship building and naval warfare.

It had nothing to do with your imaginary peacenik nonsense.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I stand by what I say bc it’s historically accurate. Dutch never claimed land for the crown or God. Thats what empires do .
@AthrillatheHunt You can believe whatever you want but it absolutely is not historically accurate.

Again you exposed your ignorance. Pretty much all the British and French colonies like the Dutch were started as private corporate ventures that were only taken over by the crown when the companies could no longer fund large enough private armies and navies to maintain them.

In fact the Netherlands is one of the only remaining colonial imperial power like France.

And like France they have modern euphemisms for the colonial imperial territories.
@AthrillatheHunt The Dutch even tried challenging the British Royal Navy as the world's naval superpower.

But again they sucked at building warships. What was supposed to be the biggest and most powerful Man o War (1800 century battleship) capsized in Rotterdam Harbour.

My uncle was from Rotterdam where they built their warships.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow still one of Europe’s biggest ports . But the Dutch never wanted to colonize or rule. They were merchants who gladly served as the middleman to real empires , transporting their slaves and diamonds and whatever else middle men do. Their “empire “ was trading outposts , like where I live . It’s exactly like the Phoenicians .
@AthrillatheHunt That is factually wrong. They absolutely did colonize many places. Some that exist to this day. And they absolutely had the same intentions. But again they didn't have the military know how to keep their empire.

Your fantasy of pacifist merchants is just that. Historical fantasy.

Rotterdam is where they tried to build the biggest imperial navy in the world, but failed.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I didn’t say passive. They had a huge lead on every maritime power in Europe (England Spain Portugal ) by at least a century . They found out early on they didn’t have the stomach to colonize militarily and became the middle men merchants instead . That position has served them well to this day (blood diamonds not withstanding ). What’s mind blowing is how they have never been condemned serving as the middle men for empires that committed atrocities . Not a single condemnation against them for the slave trade.
Avectoijesuismoi · 36-40
@AthrillatheHunt they did the dirty work and got paid. I have been to Cape town where v
Van Riebeeck built the refreshment station so that they could go to the far east around Africa to get the spices
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@Avectoijesuismoi being non judgmental allows a country to do that
Avectoijesuismoi · 36-40
@AthrillatheHunt Dutch East India company
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@Avectoijesuismoi perfect front . First world wide commodities (credit to the Dutch for that )
Avectoijesuismoi · 36-40
@AthrillatheHunt the fort is still there very interesting place and the guard is still dressed as it was and they still do the changing of it.
It was the forerunner of many things
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@Avectoijesuismoi they def left their mark on the places they had trading outposts. Some NYC places still have Dutch names . (Van Wyck expressway , spuyten duyvil, etc..)
@AthrillatheHunt The reason you probably don't see alot of criticism of the Dutch colonial Empire (they called themselves that) outside the Netherlands is because of this historical fantasy that they were just a merchant navy that by magic stumbled into having global colonies.

Being the middle man as you put it was survival. It was plan B. They were being taken apart by the British Empire and it was cooperate or die.

They lost their colonial naval ambitions because they got their ass kicked.

Not unlike the German Empire of the Kaiser or Mussolini's attempt at a colonial empire.

For those that lived under Dutch Colonial rule it was not much different from the British or the French, or Spaniards and Portuguese.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow that’s what I said. They learned early on they were not destined for a military empire and pivoted to mercantilism instead. They were the bagmen for the British Spanish and Portuguese. They were never colonial rulers in the conventional sense (taxes to the crown , military inscription , loyalty oaths etc..). They just wanted to trade , not rule . Or rather , they were only capable of trading and not of ruling.