Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear an Appeal That Would Allow Essentially ANYONE to Bring a Firearm onto YOUR Property WITHOUT Your Permission!

The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide if states may bar people from carrying guns onto someone else's private property without permission from the property owner.

The appeals court was “absolutely right to say it’s constitutional to prohibit guns on private property unless the owner says they want guns there,” said Janet Carter, managing director of Second Amendment litigation at Everytown Law. “This law respects people’s right to be safe on their own property, and we urge the Supreme Court to uphold it.”

---

🤔 But with this MAGA Court, you never know.

I guess I'd better keep my powder dry in case of tresspassers.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
FWIW, the NRA has never allowed guns at its annual meetings. The National Republican Committee has never allowed guns at its annual meetings. The Secret Service never allows guns at any presidential or vice presidential event.

It sure would be interesting to see how the gun nuts would cope with a change in these policies.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@ElwoodBlues Nor are any guns allowed in any court setting.

Would be interesting if they allowed guns in a court setting. 😆

Government property, county, state and federal, is considered private property currently.

States at least have rights under the tenth amendment. So do corporations under the fourteenth amendment.