Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

JD Vance says U.S. "looking at" selling Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine.

The White House is weighing Ukraine's request for long-range Tomahawk missiles to defend the country against Russian forces, Vice President JD Vance said Sunday.

The U.S.-made Tomahawk missile has a range of about 1,500 miles, which would place Moscow well within the range of Kyiv should the Ukrainian government obtain them.

On Monday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov implied that the U.S. was directly interfering in the war between Russian and Ukraine. "Moscow has heard Washington's statements about possible Tomahawk deliveries to Ukraine and is carefully analyzing them," Peskov said at a news conference. "It is important to understand who will be directing and launching the Tomahawk missiles from Ukrainian territory — the Americans or the Ukrainians themselves."

Speaking to Fox News later on Sunday, U.S. Special Envoy to Ukraine Keith Kellogg said "there are no such things as sanctuaries" in war and that Ukraine should have the ability to conduct long-range strikes on Russia.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jdvance-trump-zelenskyy-ukraine-russia-us/

The 180 by Vance is head-spinning, to say the least.
Top | New | Old
CedricH · 22-25, M
Wonderful news. I‘ve been arguing for the transfer of Tomahawk cruise missiles to the Ukrainian armed forces since the fall of 2022. So, I guess I was ahead of the curve 🤷🏻
Better yet. Maybe the government collects some tax. @CedricH
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
beckyromero · 36-40, F
[@ RisingMorningStar7]
The last battle is the battle of the sexes if you think a man is going to be working as you sleep with another guy...

Buh Buy!
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
You got to know when to hold them. Know when to fold them. Know when to walk away. Know when to run.

You never count your money, when sitting at the table. There will be time enough for counting, when the dealing is done.

When JD Vance supports a democratic issue, it's time to run.

More ERAMs, yes. More ATACMS, yes. More drones, Yes.

Yet Tomahawks? Insanity!

You want a M.A.D. situation? You give them Tomahawks. And very few of everything else, to defend themselves.

Something is very fishy here!
Something that sinks sky high.
CougarLisa · 36-40, F
Selling, yes!

Giving, no!
CougarLisa · 36-40, F
@AbstractWave I don't care what the billionaires or anyone else thinks! I don't want to fund any nation other than my own.
AbstractWave · 61-69, M
@CougarLisa gosh sir I don’t think you have to find them.
CougarLisa · 36-40, F
@AbstractWave whatever, girly...
Vin53 · M
CedricH · 22-25, M
@Vin53 Chancellor Palpatine, is that you?
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Vin53

With Vance, you never know. He might want to sell Ukraine ones with malfunctioning guidance systems.
sylvsn59 · 61-69, M
How do they plan on launching them, I don't think Ukraine has navy ships, definitely not subs capable.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@sylvsn59

The Marine Corps has Long Range Fires (LRF) launchers for Tomahawk missiles.
Biden arranged the deal, Trump's administration is following through. Germany is already packing missiles to hit Moscow with!
Whenever ukraine uses a missile , Russia says that the country its originated from is a target.
JackDaniels · 46-50, M
Nothing wrong with selling them. Nothing is free anymore.
They should donate some to Ukraine, not sell.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Exactly what have China and North Korea done?
dpoet · 36-40, M
@jackjjackson china and north korea have tomahawks?
Then have aupplied Russia with a lot of military equipment and purchased a lot do oil from Russia @dpoet

 
Post Comment