99.9% of peer-reviewed studies accept that man-made climate change is happening.
The “debate” is over.
This is fact.
This is fact.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
therighttothink50 · 56-60, M
Another study dispelling the theory that CO2 is driving the climate….
Over the last 25 years or so we have enabled the green cultists help destroy our entire economy while instituting thousands of energy killing regulations within all of our major industries. All of this orchestrated in order to battle a mythical villain called carbon dioxide. Something which is the primary building block for life on this planet yet has been falsely stigmatized as the greatest threat to future human survival. You really can’t make this stuff up.
Barack Obama and the leftist climate cult agenda maniacs have done more damage to the American middle class than anyone/anything else in our history. These radical cultists helped corrupt a younger generation in warping their minds and forcing most of them to take up the war on CO2.
Instead of addressing the real climate problems we have, Obama and his fellow politically driven leftists decided to fight a mythical enemy, CO2. For all those who stood by and remained silent encouraging this green hysteria and this widespread transforming of our energy sector over to this unsustainable and inefficient green system have helped destroy this nation’s economy and their children’s future.
Not only did these green drones help destroy our economy, they have made us less safe and more vulnerable to becoming destroyed by foreign adversaries like China who profited big time due to the green grift. Those who purchased and put up those solar panels have helped fund the CCP army. But how many US citizens ever contemplate this sobering fact?
Who in the MSM or cures government will enlighten people on the study below?
New Study Thoroughly Disassembles The CO2-Drives-Climate Assumption In One Fell Swoop – ‘CO2 only contributes about 4-5% to the greenhouse effect, whereas water vapor & clouds contribute 95%
https://www.climatedepot.com/2025/08/15/new-study-thoroughly-disassembles-the-co2-drives-climate-assumption-in-one-fell-swoop-co2-only-contributes-about-4-5-to-the-greenhouse-effect-whereas-water-vapor-clouds-contribute-95/
Excerpt below from full article above.
[Not only does CO2 have no discernible effect on climate, but any alleged anthropogenic role within the hypothetical greenhouse effect is not detectable either.
In recent decades there has been a concerted effort to assert it is “settled” science to characterize variability in the atmospheric CO2 concentration – assumed to be modulated by human activity – as the predominant factor in both climate change and the so-called greenhouse effect.
Science, however, is never truly settled.
A newFrontiersstudy succinctly unsettles this prevailing paradigm with surgeon-like precision. In under 20 pages the authors deliver a cogent critique of the CO2-drives-climate presumption. A few of the key points include:
• CO2 only contributes about 4-5% to the greenhouse effect, whereas water vapor and clouds contribute 95%.
• Of that 4-5% greenhouse effect contribution from CO2, just 4% of that can be attributed to human activities (i.e., fossil fuel emissions). Thus, about 96% of the 4% contribution from CO2 can be attributed to natural processes…… Finish reading in link]
Over the last 25 years or so we have enabled the green cultists help destroy our entire economy while instituting thousands of energy killing regulations within all of our major industries. All of this orchestrated in order to battle a mythical villain called carbon dioxide. Something which is the primary building block for life on this planet yet has been falsely stigmatized as the greatest threat to future human survival. You really can’t make this stuff up.
Barack Obama and the leftist climate cult agenda maniacs have done more damage to the American middle class than anyone/anything else in our history. These radical cultists helped corrupt a younger generation in warping their minds and forcing most of them to take up the war on CO2.
Instead of addressing the real climate problems we have, Obama and his fellow politically driven leftists decided to fight a mythical enemy, CO2. For all those who stood by and remained silent encouraging this green hysteria and this widespread transforming of our energy sector over to this unsustainable and inefficient green system have helped destroy this nation’s economy and their children’s future.
Not only did these green drones help destroy our economy, they have made us less safe and more vulnerable to becoming destroyed by foreign adversaries like China who profited big time due to the green grift. Those who purchased and put up those solar panels have helped fund the CCP army. But how many US citizens ever contemplate this sobering fact?
Who in the MSM or cures government will enlighten people on the study below?
New Study Thoroughly Disassembles The CO2-Drives-Climate Assumption In One Fell Swoop – ‘CO2 only contributes about 4-5% to the greenhouse effect, whereas water vapor & clouds contribute 95%
https://www.climatedepot.com/2025/08/15/new-study-thoroughly-disassembles-the-co2-drives-climate-assumption-in-one-fell-swoop-co2-only-contributes-about-4-5-to-the-greenhouse-effect-whereas-water-vapor-clouds-contribute-95/
Excerpt below from full article above.
[Not only does CO2 have no discernible effect on climate, but any alleged anthropogenic role within the hypothetical greenhouse effect is not detectable either.
In recent decades there has been a concerted effort to assert it is “settled” science to characterize variability in the atmospheric CO2 concentration – assumed to be modulated by human activity – as the predominant factor in both climate change and the so-called greenhouse effect.
Science, however, is never truly settled.
A newFrontiersstudy succinctly unsettles this prevailing paradigm with surgeon-like precision. In under 20 pages the authors deliver a cogent critique of the CO2-drives-climate presumption. A few of the key points include:
• CO2 only contributes about 4-5% to the greenhouse effect, whereas water vapor and clouds contribute 95%.
• Of that 4-5% greenhouse effect contribution from CO2, just 4% of that can be attributed to human activities (i.e., fossil fuel emissions). Thus, about 96% of the 4% contribution from CO2 can be attributed to natural processes…… Finish reading in link]
@therighttothink50
LOL nice try! The “new paper that proves climate change is a hoax.”
Let's rip it apart hehe:
1. “CO₂ only makes up 4–5% of the greenhouse effect.”
That number’s way off. Multiple independent studies show CO₂ is responsible for about 20% of the greenhouse effect. Water vapour does more, but it depends on CO₂. No CO₂ “control knob,” no water vapour blanket.
By the way, you think planes don't pump millions of tons of water vapour into the atmosphere every single minute of every day?
2. “Human CO₂ is tiny compared to natural sources.”
Myth. Natural emissions and absorptions were basically balanced for thousands of years. Humans dumped an extra 40 billion tonnes a year on top. That imbalance is why CO₂ has shot from 280 ppm to 420 ppm in just 150 years. The fingerprint (isotopes, ocean chemistry) screams “fossil fuels.” That's fact.
3. “No evidence CO₂ affects radiation.”
Bullshit. We’ve measured it. Satellites literally see CO₂’s heat-trapping signature in Earth’s outgoing radiation. Ground stations have measured extra downward heat in the exact wavelengths CO₂ absorbs. Physics doesn’t care about X hot takes.
4. “It’s just the lapse rate (temperature drop with altitude).”
Yes, convection and the lapse rate matter. But that explains why it’s colder at the top of a mountain, not why the whole planet is heating up. Radiative forcing from greenhouse gases explains the warming trend. Both pieces fit together.
5. “CO₂ lags temperature, so it can’t drive warming.”
That’s Ice Age logic. Back then, orbital shifts started the warming, then CO₂ amplified it. Today the roles are reversed: humans are the source, and CO₂ is doing the heavy lifting.
This paper is a hilariously contrarian take that ignores mountains of direct evidence. The physics of CO₂ warming isn’t some fringe guess, sorry! It’s measured, observed, and used in weather forecasting every single day.
So no, this isn’t proof of a hoax. It’s just another attempt to cherry-pick a few points while brushing aside the hard data.
Try again.
LOL nice try! The “new paper that proves climate change is a hoax.”
Let's rip it apart hehe:
1. “CO₂ only makes up 4–5% of the greenhouse effect.”
That number’s way off. Multiple independent studies show CO₂ is responsible for about 20% of the greenhouse effect. Water vapour does more, but it depends on CO₂. No CO₂ “control knob,” no water vapour blanket.
By the way, you think planes don't pump millions of tons of water vapour into the atmosphere every single minute of every day?
2. “Human CO₂ is tiny compared to natural sources.”
Myth. Natural emissions and absorptions were basically balanced for thousands of years. Humans dumped an extra 40 billion tonnes a year on top. That imbalance is why CO₂ has shot from 280 ppm to 420 ppm in just 150 years. The fingerprint (isotopes, ocean chemistry) screams “fossil fuels.” That's fact.
3. “No evidence CO₂ affects radiation.”
Bullshit. We’ve measured it. Satellites literally see CO₂’s heat-trapping signature in Earth’s outgoing radiation. Ground stations have measured extra downward heat in the exact wavelengths CO₂ absorbs. Physics doesn’t care about X hot takes.
4. “It’s just the lapse rate (temperature drop with altitude).”
Yes, convection and the lapse rate matter. But that explains why it’s colder at the top of a mountain, not why the whole planet is heating up. Radiative forcing from greenhouse gases explains the warming trend. Both pieces fit together.
5. “CO₂ lags temperature, so it can’t drive warming.”
That’s Ice Age logic. Back then, orbital shifts started the warming, then CO₂ amplified it. Today the roles are reversed: humans are the source, and CO₂ is doing the heavy lifting.
This paper is a hilariously contrarian take that ignores mountains of direct evidence. The physics of CO₂ warming isn’t some fringe guess, sorry! It’s measured, observed, and used in weather forecasting every single day.
So no, this isn’t proof of a hoax. It’s just another attempt to cherry-pick a few points while brushing aside the hard data.
Try again.