Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Asylum-seekers thought they were following the rules. Now some are told to start over.

Asylum-seekers thought they were following the rules. Now some are told to start over

Source NPR

The Trump administration is stripping protections of some asylum applicants who filed as far back as 2019.

NPR has learned that dozens of immigrants across the U.S. have received letters in the mail notifying them that their asylum cases have been dismissed by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), a branch of the Department of Homeland Security.

The reason, according to the letters: These asylum-seekers, many of whom entered between 2019 and 2022, did not receive a mandatory screening, known as a "credible fear" interview, at the border.

The interview is conducted by an asylum officer once someone has been detained or has arrived in the United States. It is meant as an opportunity for a person to describe any fear of persecution they may face if they are returned to their home country.

The U.S. didn't have enough asylum officers to do credible fear interviews for every person crossing the border, given the huge influx of border-crossers starting with the COVID-19 pandemic, at the end of the first Trump administration and during the Biden administration, experts told NPR. Now it appears that the new Trump administration is dismissing applications, effectively making people start over on a process they began years ago.

This round of asylum case dismissals is the latest effort by the Trump administration to strip protections from those who have been in the U.S. for years. In the past few months, the administration has limited the ways in which people can seek asylum, has made the process more expensive and is now reviewing already filed claims and dismissing them if parts of the complex application are missing. But as officials expand the scope of whom they are arresting, detaining and deporting, lawyers fear their clients who have been waiting years for their asylum interviews may get caught up in the effort to conduct mass deportations.

Asylum is a form of protection granted to those who either have already entered the U.S. or are at a port of entry, having left their home country. After an application is filed, applicants receive work permits, pay taxes and can enroll in school.

"You're literally making documented people, again, undocumented, and they're already in here," said Michelle Marty Rivera, an immigration attorney who has dozens of clients who have received these letters. "You are canceling employment authorization. You're virtually converting people that are following the normal traditional asylum rules and leaving them without a status and without protection and asking them to show their faces to ICE."

Lawyers told NPR that in some cases, their clients may have been marked for "expedited removal" when they first entered the country. That is a form of deportation for people who have been in the U.S. for less than two years.

When asked about the asylum application dismissals, USCIS spokesman Matthew Tragesser said that if upon reviewing an application, USCIS discovers that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Protection designated a person as in "expedited removal," USCIS administratively closes the application due to a lack of jurisdiction.

"This is a long-standing practice that is not new," Tragesser said. Per USCIS' process, the credible fear interview is key to pulling someone out of expedited removal prior to filing for asylum.

"The credible fear [interview] is considered a screening tool. And essentially there's a higher standard that when someone achieves that, then they can then go through the asylum process," said Morgan Bailey, a former USCIS official who served under both Trump and Biden, adding that for the last 15 years, the agency has not been able to keep up with the number of asylum-seekers who need credible fear interviews. "There aren't enough asylum officers to cover the workload, but there has also been such an increase in the number of asylum applications."

But now, immigration attorneys are warning that immigrants are facing the consequences of that shortage.

There are different versions of the letters that asylum applicants received, and NPR has reviewed some of them. Applicants began receiving them in July. The letters say that all processing of their asylum application is terminated. In some letters, applicants are told to await a notice from ICE about when their credible fear interview will be scheduled. In others, the letters tell them to report to ICE first and request the interview. Some are not clear on next steps.

Attorney Maria Florencia Garcia has one client who entered through the southern border and was originally put into expedited removal but was released into the U.S. before he received his interview.

"Once he was released, they did schedule a credible fear interview, but [it] was canceled. We tried to get a reschedule for a couple of years. It never happened," Florencia Garcia said, adding that they applied for asylum anyway because that must be filed within a year of being in the country. But in recent weeks, that client got the letter notifying them of the dismissal.

He's unable to work. He's not going to be able to renew his employment authorization card," Florencia Garcia said. "The only way that he's going to be able to proceed is by showing up to ICE, telling them that he has a fear of return, and that will likely get him detained."

Arno Lemus, another immigration attorney, sees this effort from the second Trump administration as an attempt to reclassify a certain set of asylum applicants who primarily came in during the Biden years.

"They're just doing the process that was allotted to them that was legal and provided to them the moment that they presented themselves in the U.S.," Lemus said, noting that some of his clients have also received the letters. "And now the government's wanting to retroactively go back."

Lemus agrees with USCIS that the policy is not necessarily new — the credible fear interviews are the prerequisite to filing for asylum. But like other attorneys, Lemus said he has clients who have been waiting for upwards of six years for their asylum case to be reviewed.

"The issue is that people were already released into the U.S. They've already established years of processing. They've paid taxes. They've got jobs. Some of them have made investments in the U.S.," Lemus said

The Trump administration this summer unveiled a new policy requiring immigrants who entered the country illegally to be put in detention without an opportunity for release while they fight their cases.

Immigration lawyers told NPR that they are concerned that their clients, who were awaiting their asylum interviews, will get detained if they report to ICE to schedule their credible fear interviews.

"There's a lack of trust. There's a lot of uncertainty that makes people afraid. It makes people not want to fight their cases, whether they're strong or not," said Florencia Garcia. "They just don't want to risk it."

ICE has increased the number of arrests at immigration courts, and high-profile worksite enforcement operations have left many afraid.

"You go to court — you get detained; you go to your ICE appointment — you get detained; you go to work — you get detained; you apply for asylum — you were processed incorrectly," Lemus said. "You just can't do anything."
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
Trump been doing that, that happened even to a veteran who fought and because he had drug charges from 20 years ago, they deported him. This was in the time that ptsd wasn't well known and that's what he ended up having.

There's numerous people who are going for routine appts to keep their green cards and being deported.

It's not about illegal immigration, it's just white nationalism and them thinking about excuses
missyann · 56-60
@SatanBurger You guys love using“
“ white supremacy and nationalism racism Christian nationalist “ It can NEVER be about laws being broken

There is a legal way of come into America
If they are already being deported they have deportation orders under other administrations or qualified for expedited removal
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann

"You guys love using“
“ white supremacy and nationalism racism Christian nationalist “

If the shoe fits, wear it.

Go ask Speaker Johnson if he supports the Constitution.
He has said he follows biblical law.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@missyann It's because it's not about laws being broken, people just have a hard time facing up to the fact they're racist when they use those rationalizations.

Once people admit what they are, they can start being a better person but until then we'll keep having this same conversation.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann So those immigrants who are appearing in court for their hearings, trying to follow the law....then get swept up by the masked ICE cowards......

You're fine with that?
missyann · 56-60
@JSul3 There are some ( not all or even most )who are showing up “ now “for their hearings who have intentionally been “ no shows “for prior scheduled hearings Because they knew that they would probably be deported because of either a criminal record or have an immigration violation. If they have never had a hearing. They will have a chance to be found eligible. If they have had an earlier hearing ( their due process ). They can legally receive expedited removal

No one is just being “ swept up “
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@missyann
all the ones I know are not white nationalist or racist. It is all about the law.

First, history shows that colonialists can turn two groups against each other quite easily. The Tutsis and Hutu are a prime example when the colonialist's propaganda at the time was to pit the two groups against one another by introducing manufactured conflict in which the Tutsis were seen as superior. Yeah still racist but they made one group feel valued more than the other and that's all that's needed really.

Colonialists have famous letters documented in which they said all they had to do in Africa was to erase tribal lines. Conflict used to be more localized instead of spread outward, colonialists though sought to erase those lines.

That was all that was needed, the rest did the work for them.

Secondly, most of maga are white nationalists. There's a difference between one issue voters who are fence sitters and vote on one issue who may have voted Trump vs people who are die hard maga.

The people who are die hards are mostly white racists and there's many. Many are the kinds of people who say I'm not racist and then low key attribute all kinds of things but will like you if you're black and you know your place.

But only if you know your place much like how Marjorie Taylor Greene called out the gop for their anti woman ways and MTG is as far right as they come.

Mtg was cool with them until she overreached and stood outside of her dog kennel.

Thirdly, the ones responsible for the propaganda that you see around immigration are far right white nationalists who are largely in power more so than any other race.

We are talking about who has the power to change things. Statistics show that we still don't have as much representation as we think in our govt which means a lot of the propaganda is geared to whites.

The black or cuban people (some who Trump deported despite them being maga,) have voted Trump and they deported them. They are only good for votes, after that, you got rid of them.

I’ve had a Hispanic employer who came to this country legallyq and worked her ass off and waited 10 years to become a citizen. This is why he had a large number of Hispanic voters. They expect everybody to follow the same steps they did to become citizens.

It wouldn't take ten years if they fixed some of the immigration laws to make it easier to become a citizen but white nationalism is prevalent in our system so we're not going to. Also my answer is the same as above. Hispanics aren't die hard supporters other than a few, they are likely one issue voters who like the Tutsi and Hutu fell for people like maga
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@missyann
You continue to play the professional victim

I'm not the one who is whining about immigrants like my life is harder than them.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann
You know that how?
I have watched the arrests take place on video from several sources.

They have a court date and they show up. Some of the judgees, knowing that ICE are just outside the courtroom door, purposely dismiss their case, knowing it's a green light for the masked ICE thugs to arrest them.

Targeting courthouse appointments:
ICE is specifically targeting individuals who show up for hearings and appointments at immigration courts and other government offices, according to the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA).
"Just a trap":
As described by one official, the court hearing is being used as a trap to get people into a position where they can be apprehended by ICE agents.
Dismissal of cases:
In some instances, the government is ordering judges to dismiss cases so that ICE can immediately place individuals into expedited removal proceedings, bypassing due process, notes AILA.
Why this tactic is controversial:
Undermines due process:
Advocates argue that arresting people at immigration courthouses undermines the legal process and removes their right to due process.
Chilling effect:
The tactic is creating a chilling effect, making immigrants hesitant to show up for their required court dates and potentially harming victims of crimes.
Violation of law:
Legal organizations argue this practice is illegal and have filed lawsuits to stop it.
missyann · 56-60
@JSul3 I know how it’s being done. It is a legal process.

President Trump did not write or sign the expedited removal process. Bill Clinton did under the immigration reform act in 1996. Bill Clinton signed for fast track.
Look it up. President Trump is just the first president to use it on this scale.

Look up the expedited removal process. If They can’t prove that they have been in the United States for at least two years and don’t have documentation.
They are allowed to be deported WITHOUT due process. Most immigrants who cross the border illegally wouldn’t have documentation.

The ALA can fight for their right to seek asylum and for an appeal, but most won’t get it

Again, this isn’t President Trump side stepping the law. He is the first president who has allowed DHS, and.ICE to do their job. You may not like it, but he is doing what he was elected to do.
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann Crossing the border illegally is a misdemeanor, not a felony.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
missyann · 56-60
@JSul3 I never said it was a felony. I know it’s a misdemeanor, but a misdemeanor can still a crime and can land someone in jail ( detention )
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@missyann Oh, you mean a crime like stealing government documents, sexual harassment, tax and business fraud, and stealing an election.
missyann · 56-60
@MarkPaul Yep. He is a citizen and citizens are entitled to due process. Expedited removals are not citizens, nor are they entitled to the same due process.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@missyann Still making up your own rules, I see. I can see my work is cut out for me. *Rolls up sleeves*
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann "Nobody is being swept up."

LOL.
missyann · 56-60
@MarkPaul What rules am I making up?
missyann · 56-60
@JSul3 I should have said that no
“ innocent people “. Are getting swept up.
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann
Yes, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has arrested and detained numerous individuals with no criminal convictions, including U.S. citizens, according to recent data and reports. Data shows a significant portion of people in ICE detention have no criminal record, a trend that has increased significantly in the past year. Critics argue that this widespread detention of non-criminal individuals, some of whom are U.S. citizens, raises concerns about racial profiling and violations of constitutional rights.

Evidence of Arrests of Non-Criminals
Federal Data:
New data obtained by the Cato Institute shows that a large percentage of people in ICE detention have no criminal convictions, with one report stating that 65% of individuals booked into ICE detention since October 2024 lacked criminal convictions.
Increasing Trend:
The number of people in detention with no criminal convictions or pending charges has significantly increased, with the Cato Institute noting an over 1,000% rise since January 2017.
Non-Detained Arrests:
Reports also indicate ICE is arresting individuals with no criminal history directly from the streets, including those who were previously considered safe from deportation under past administrations.

Cases of U.S. Citizens Detained
Citizen Detainment:
There are documented cases of U.S. citizens being detained by ICE, such as a 71-year-old woman who was handcuffed and held for eight hours during court proceedings, an event that traumatized her and raised concerns about ICE's practices.
Growing Concerns:
These incidents of citizen detainment highlight broader concerns about how immigration enforcement is being carried out and the potential impact on the constitutional rights of U.S. citizens.
Criticism and Concerns
Racial Profiling:
The widespread crackdown and arrests of non-criminal immigrants, including U.S. citizens, have led to accusations of racial profiling and constitutional violations.
Misinformation and Misjudgments:
In some cases, individuals were targeted based on misinterpretations or misidentifications, such as tattoos that were unrelated to criminal gangs.
Impact on Communities:
These practices can create fear and instability within immigrant communities and among citizens, as people become wary of interactions with law enforcement.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann Arresting people with no criminal record?

What world do you reside in?
missyann · 56-60
@JSul3 They are illegal immigrants. Yes it is only a misdemeanor A person can be arrested and jailed for a misdemeanor ( detained )

Where there are illegal criminals there are usually illegal immigrants They aren’t going leave them because they will be gone

The police is looking for a killer and they come across a bank robber. Should they ignore the bank robber because they are hunting a killer?
JSul3 · 70-79
@missyann

Why are these guys wearing masks?
Don't give me this BS about them fearing retribution.
Legit cops have badges and 🆔 and don't cover their faces.

Exactly how many killers and drug dealers have they arrested?