Reason10 · 70-79, M
It's strange how the parties have moved.
In the Rush Limbaugh 90s, there was the conservative Republican Party (red) and the liberal Democrat party (blue). Since then, the Democrats have gone so far to the Fascist LEFT they are making Republicans today look like centrists.
In the Rush Limbaugh 90s, there was the conservative Republican Party (red) and the liberal Democrat party (blue). Since then, the Democrats have gone so far to the Fascist LEFT they are making Republicans today look like centrists.
View 1 more replies »
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SomeMichGuy · M
@samueltyler2 You and most others, from Madison onwards.
Though they broadcast their intentions, most people thought they'd never do it. I believe only the conspirators knew that the plan was very fleshed-out and ready.
But we were warned.
Though they broadcast their intentions, most people thought they'd never do it. I believe only the conspirators knew that the plan was very fleshed-out and ready.
But we were warned.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@SomeMichGuy they published the plan, i read Project 2025. It was the blueprint.
SomeMichGuy · M
@samueltyler2 Yes, which is why I said they broadcast their intentions & we were warned.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Depends on the country.
USA Blue is Democrat, Red is Republican.
Yet most other countries it's the reverse.
Yes Canada it's the reverse.
Weirdly neither color is about communism. China was red long before it was communist.
AI generated...
I must reiterate that both democracy and republics are not communistic. Both have their origins in Rome or Greece.
Social democracy has nothing to do with communism. Communism is based solely on COMMUNITIES.
The communities are supposed to have the power. Not individuals. So even China is not communistic.
AI generated for clarity....
Please note Item seven discribes China the best.
A State Capitalism
AI generated again:
USA Blue is Democrat, Red is Republican.
Yet most other countries it's the reverse.
Yes Canada it's the reverse.
Weirdly neither color is about communism. China was red long before it was communist.
AI generated...
Red has been significant in Chinese culture for centuries, symbolizing good fortune, happiness, and celebration, long before the rise of communism.
I must reiterate that both democracy and republics are not communistic. Both have their origins in Rome or Greece.
Social democracy has nothing to do with communism. Communism is based solely on COMMUNITIES.
The communities are supposed to have the power. Not individuals. So even China is not communistic.
AI generated for clarity....
Here’s a comprehensive listing of the various forms of governance discussed, along with brief descriptions of each:
📜 Forms of Governance
1. Democracy
A system where citizens have the power to make decisions through voting. It emphasizes individual rights and freedoms.
2. Republic
A form of democracy where representatives are elected to make decisions on behalf of the citizens. It often includes a constitution to protect individual rights.
3. Social Democracy
An ideology that combines democratic governance with social justice, advocating for reforms within a capitalist framework to ensure social welfare and reduce inequality.
4. Socialism
A system advocating for social ownership and democratic control of the means of production. It aims to reduce inequality and provide public services, allowing for some private ownership.
5. Communism
An ideology that seeks to establish a classless society through the communal ownership of all property. It emphasizes equality and aims to abolish private property.
6. Capitalism
An economic system characterized by private ownership of the means of production, where market forces determine prices and production. It emphasizes individual profit and competition.
7. State Capitalism
A system where the state has significant control over the economy, often operating businesses for profit while maintaining a capitalist framework. This can blur the lines between capitalism and socialism.
This listing captures the key forms of governance and their fundamental principles, illustrating the diversity of political and economic systems in practice. Each system has its own unique characteristics and implications for society.
📜 Forms of Governance
1. Democracy
A system where citizens have the power to make decisions through voting. It emphasizes individual rights and freedoms.
2. Republic
A form of democracy where representatives are elected to make decisions on behalf of the citizens. It often includes a constitution to protect individual rights.
3. Social Democracy
An ideology that combines democratic governance with social justice, advocating for reforms within a capitalist framework to ensure social welfare and reduce inequality.
4. Socialism
A system advocating for social ownership and democratic control of the means of production. It aims to reduce inequality and provide public services, allowing for some private ownership.
5. Communism
An ideology that seeks to establish a classless society through the communal ownership of all property. It emphasizes equality and aims to abolish private property.
6. Capitalism
An economic system characterized by private ownership of the means of production, where market forces determine prices and production. It emphasizes individual profit and competition.
7. State Capitalism
A system where the state has significant control over the economy, often operating businesses for profit while maintaining a capitalist framework. This can blur the lines between capitalism and socialism.
This listing captures the key forms of governance and their fundamental principles, illustrating the diversity of political and economic systems in practice. Each system has its own unique characteristics and implications for society.
Please note Item seven discribes China the best.
A State Capitalism
AI generated again:
Your observation about state capitalism accurately reflects the unique economic model employed by China. Here’s a more detailed look at how state capitalism characterizes China's governance:
🇨🇳 State Capitalism in China
Key Features:
Government Control: The Chinese government maintains significant control over key industries and sectors, often owning major enterprises while allowing private businesses to operate alongside state-owned enterprises (SOEs).
Market Reforms: Since the late 1970s, China has implemented market-oriented reforms that have introduced elements of capitalism, such as foreign investment and private entrepreneurship, while still being governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Economic Growth: While China has experienced rapid economic growth, leading to increased GDP and urbanization, this growth has not uniformly benefited all segments of the population. Many individuals, particularly in rural areas, continue to face economic hardships.
Ongoing Challenges:
Poverty and Inequality: Despite government claims of lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty, critics argue that these figures may not accurately reflect the realities faced by many, especially in rural regions. Income inequality remains a significant issue, with a persistent gap between urban and rural wealth.
Quality of Life: Economic indicators do not always translate to improved quality of life. Issues such as environmental degradation, lack of access to healthcare, and inadequate social services can affect overall well-being for many citizens.
Social Stability: The disparity in wealth and living conditions can lead to social unrest and dissatisfaction among those who feel left behind by the rapid economic changes.
Implications:
Hybrid System: China's state capitalism represents a hybrid system that combines elements of both capitalism and socialism. This blending can lead to confusion about its classification as a truly communist state.
Global Influence: The model has garnered attention worldwide, influencing other nations and prompting discussions about the effectiveness of different governance structures in achieving economic development. However, the challenges of poverty and inequality raise questions about the sustainability and equity of this approach.
Conclusion:
The complexities and challenges of poverty, inequality, and social stability in China highlight the need for a critical examination of the impacts of state capitalism on the population. While the economic changes have been significant, the realities faced by many citizens must be acknowledged in discussions about the country's governance model.
Your insight into this aspect of China's governance highlights the complexity of political and economic systems and the importance of understanding how they function in practice. Thank you for pointing that out!
🇨🇳 State Capitalism in China
Key Features:
Government Control: The Chinese government maintains significant control over key industries and sectors, often owning major enterprises while allowing private businesses to operate alongside state-owned enterprises (SOEs).
Market Reforms: Since the late 1970s, China has implemented market-oriented reforms that have introduced elements of capitalism, such as foreign investment and private entrepreneurship, while still being governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Economic Growth: While China has experienced rapid economic growth, leading to increased GDP and urbanization, this growth has not uniformly benefited all segments of the population. Many individuals, particularly in rural areas, continue to face economic hardships.
Ongoing Challenges:
Poverty and Inequality: Despite government claims of lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty, critics argue that these figures may not accurately reflect the realities faced by many, especially in rural regions. Income inequality remains a significant issue, with a persistent gap between urban and rural wealth.
Quality of Life: Economic indicators do not always translate to improved quality of life. Issues such as environmental degradation, lack of access to healthcare, and inadequate social services can affect overall well-being for many citizens.
Social Stability: The disparity in wealth and living conditions can lead to social unrest and dissatisfaction among those who feel left behind by the rapid economic changes.
Implications:
Hybrid System: China's state capitalism represents a hybrid system that combines elements of both capitalism and socialism. This blending can lead to confusion about its classification as a truly communist state.
Global Influence: The model has garnered attention worldwide, influencing other nations and prompting discussions about the effectiveness of different governance structures in achieving economic development. However, the challenges of poverty and inequality raise questions about the sustainability and equity of this approach.
Conclusion:
The complexities and challenges of poverty, inequality, and social stability in China highlight the need for a critical examination of the impacts of state capitalism on the population. While the economic changes have been significant, the realities faced by many citizens must be acknowledged in discussions about the country's governance model.
Your insight into this aspect of China's governance highlights the complexity of political and economic systems and the importance of understanding how they function in practice. Thank you for pointing that out!
OldBrit · 61-69, M
Democrats blue. Republican red.
Yes touch confusing nearly universally in Europe etc red = left wing but opposite in USA for some reason.
Yes touch confusing nearly universally in Europe etc red = left wing but opposite in USA for some reason.
Dino11 · M
Red, White, and Blue, We are All Americans!
Semper Fi!
Semper Fi!
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@CGS1984 used to be at Diddys Hamptons house every summer
SomeMichGuy · M
Oddly, blue, which was historically meant for the nobility, is associated with the Democratic Party.
Red is associated with the Republican Party.
@DunningKruger is correct that this is a more recent innovation.
Red is associated with the Republican Party.
@DunningKruger is correct that this is a more recent innovation.
SomeMichGuy · M
@AthrillatheHunt Yeah, and very expensive to make, thus, "royal blue".
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SomeMichGuy · M
@BlueGreenGrey Yes...very strange to like red so much as a "conservative"...smh
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
We only have 1 party . You mean which side wears red or blue when they have an inter team scrimmage ?
Jenny1234 · 56-60, F
@AthrillatheHunt don’t confuse me any more than I already am
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@Jenny1234 I’m not the one trying to confuse , they are . Haha
3Dogmatic · 46-50, M
Two wings of the same bird…
Weirdly, the ones who call everyone communist are the red party.
American logic
American logic
Vin53 · M
Red is dead, blue is true.
MartinII · 70-79, M
Republican red, Democrat blue. Not quite as odd as might appear, because historically the GOP was, relatively, left wing and the Democrats were, among other things, the party of the racist south. Times change.
ALL American parties are PURPLE!
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
Republicans are red, Democrats are blue. This has only been a thing for the past 20 years or so.
swirlie · 31-35
In Canada, red is Liberal and blue is Conservative and orange is Kool-Aide.
USA is the opposite. Red is Conservative (Repelicans), blue is Libs (Dems).
USA is the opposite. Red is Conservative (Repelicans), blue is Libs (Dems).
Zonuss · 46-50, M
Smart people vote blue.
And crazy people vote, red.
Simple. 🙂
And crazy people vote, red.
Simple. 🙂
YoMomma ·
Idk either i think the democrats are blue.. they shoulda been red tho 😅 they mad
Musicman · 61-69, M
Red is Republican and Blue is Democrat.