PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
Umm no. As usual you are wrong. This is not about Hamas. This is about genocide. You do not get 90+ % civilian casualties unless the civilians are your target. Period. There were literally better ratios during WW2 carpet and fire bombings.
Taking over food distribution so you can silence any dissent and setting up ambush points at food checkpoints is deliberate slaughter of civilians.
You really really seem to want to set new records for garbage politics and take the gold medal with genocide apologia.
Taking over food distribution so you can silence any dissent and setting up ambush points at food checkpoints is deliberate slaughter of civilians.
You really really seem to want to set new records for garbage politics and take the gold medal with genocide apologia.
View 2 more replies »
CedricH · 22-25, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow At least you‘re always entertaining, I‘ll give you that. But then again, the mixture of ignorance and self-righteousness tends to be amusing.
As far as Israeli PR‘s concerned, I‘m pretty critical of Israel‘s government and the IDF, which you would know if you had actually read the post.
As far as Israeli PR‘s concerned, I‘m pretty critical of Israel‘s government and the IDF, which you would know if you had actually read the post.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@CedricH Even framing a genocidal slaughter as a war is a choice and political position.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
An occupying army has the responsibility to feed a starving nation.
But the UN isn't an occupying army. Neither are the Israelis. You don't occupying enemy territory with air strikes.
So, yes, there are the 4 critical pillars you mentioned.
But pillar number III is most important. And with III, number IV becomes redundant. But only with pillar number III can pillar number I be successful.
At some point it is going to have to be the Palestinians themselves that are going to have to chose a different path than Hamas. They are going to have to become pillar number III. They are going to have to "occupy" their own country by throwing Hamas out.
But the UN isn't an occupying army. Neither are the Israelis. You don't occupying enemy territory with air strikes.
So, yes, there are the 4 critical pillars you mentioned.
But pillar number III is most important. And with III, number IV becomes redundant. But only with pillar number III can pillar number I be successful.
At some point it is going to have to be the Palestinians themselves that are going to have to chose a different path than Hamas. They are going to have to become pillar number III. They are going to have to "occupy" their own country by throwing Hamas out.
CedricH · 22-25, M
@beckyromero
And this assertion basically sums up the entire argument of my post. If Israel does not actually control all of Gaza, it’s very difficult to organize an effective aid distribution that doesn’t undermine Israel‘s legitimate military objectives.
And that‘s one reason why Israel‘s strategic approach has to definitively shift from a pressure campaign to a clear, hold and build strategy. At some point, once security is established, the responsibilities for arming and training a local Gazan police force and the management of the reconstruction can be outsourced to willing Arab nations (the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco) acting in concert with private contractors and aid agencies while Israel would supervise the entire effort from the air, from checkpoints and from a buffer zone in and around Gaza‘s periphery.
pillar number III is most important
That is correct. And with III, number IV becomes redundant
I wouldn’t necessarily say that. A separation of civilians and combatants would still be required even if Israel were to finally establish total operational control and freedom of maneuver in all parts of Gaza. But only with pillar number III can pillar number I be successful.
And this assertion basically sums up the entire argument of my post. If Israel does not actually control all of Gaza, it’s very difficult to organize an effective aid distribution that doesn’t undermine Israel‘s legitimate military objectives.
And that‘s one reason why Israel‘s strategic approach has to definitively shift from a pressure campaign to a clear, hold and build strategy. At some point, once security is established, the responsibilities for arming and training a local Gazan police force and the management of the reconstruction can be outsourced to willing Arab nations (the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco) acting in concert with private contractors and aid agencies while Israel would supervise the entire effort from the air, from checkpoints and from a buffer zone in and around Gaza‘s periphery.
YoMomma ·
In regards to aid there were people giving aid to the civilians but hamas hated it because they want control of the supplies and the population so they attacked and kidnaped the aid distributers .. who were local gazans.. hamas basically runs like a violent mob out there.. they want the un to bring the aid because the un works with hamas and they have men and infulence in the un because the un is complicit with their terrorist agendas against israel.. they even teach anti israel terrorist agendas in the un funded schools in gaza. It’s Evil
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment