Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

How do leftists propose to fix leftist misgovernance? Easy. More leftism.

The irony is that this “affordability crisis” - in New York and other blue metropoles - is the result of failed Democratic governance. Rent control and eviction limits have caused landlords to take tens of thousands of apartments off the market. A higher minimum wage raised the cost of food and other basics, while rich union contracts keep transportation inefficient and costly. Climate bans and mandates have raised energy costs.

Mamdani’s proposed minimum-wage increase from $16.50 to $30 an hour by 2030 makes California look conservative. The Golden State has already seen the consequences of a $20 minimum wage for fast-food workers: fewer jobs and higher prices.
Seattle’s much-cited experiment with a $15 minimum wage notably resulted in a meaningful reduction of hours worked for low-wage employees, for example.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated a federal $17 minimum wage by 2029 could eliminate up to 2 million jobs nationally. Now imagine the havoc a $30 wage floor would wreak on NYC‘s local labor market.

What’s more, a growing literature finds that even where firms avoid layoffs, they often adjust in ways that mitigate the net benefits to many low-skilled employees: by reducing non-wage benefits, altering schedules, cutting back on workplace amenities and training, demanding more of their workers, or hiring more experienced employees.

Ultimately, the economic effects of Mamdani’s $30-per-hour wage proposal appear clear: substantial income gains for many workers who remain employed, but significant job losses, reduced work hours, business closures, accelerated automation, and regional employment shifts.

New York City‘s rent-stabilization program already makes it impossible for some landlords to cover their costs. Others find it cheaper to leave apartments empty if needed repairs aren’t worth the investment. Tens of thousands of rent-stabilized units sat vacant in 2023, according to U.S. Census data. More will be empty if landlords can’t pay their mortgages, and tighter supply pushes prices up.

What would be the correct response? Austin‘s leading the way. Rent control isn’t permitted in the state of Texas and even Democratic Mayors have focused on expanding supply through a combination of legal, regulatory and zoning reforms, rather than on mindlessly subsidizing demand.

The results? Since 2022, prices and rents are down sharply in Austin. Not pleasant if you bought a house or broke ground on an apartment building at the peak. But for Austin, it’s a very good thing. Falling home prices are a sign of a functioning, self-equilibrating market. A surge in demand raised prices, which led to more supply and, eventually, cooling prices and rents.

There is nothing self-equilibrating about New York’s housing market. Supply has been stubbornly unresponsive to steadily rising prices and rents. Should Mamdani go on to win the general election, sticking to his adversarial approach to landlords and private developers won’t fix this.

Austin and New York are mirror images of American housing policy. Austin’s approach is typical in Southern and Southwestern and primarily red and purple states, with fewer restrictions on construction and rents. New York is an extreme example of coastal and Midwestern blue-state metros with less land, and more-restrictive building and rent rules.

The city of Austin loosened building restrictions, including allowing up to three houses on a single lot, reducing minimum lot size, reducing parking requirements, exempting small developments from the site-plan process, and making changes to design standards. The state has played a part too, limiting lot-width minimums and restrictions on housing in commercial zones.

By contrast, New York’s housing supply is heavily regulated and totally dependent on complicated pieces of legislation.
Zoning changes in the 1960s made it harder for supply to respond dynamically to rising demand. Idiosyncratic regulations, such as on the use of stationary cranes and liability for accidents, raise construction costs.

Rent control or rent “stabilization,” now covering roughly half the city’s units, discourages tenants from moving and landlords from upgrading the quality of units. Mamdani’s rent freeze would make that worse. After a 2019 state law tightened conditions for rent increases, vacancy rates plummeted. On top of that comes a 2025 ban on the longstanding practice of brokers charging tenants fees. Rents rose overnight and have continued to climb.

New York has generally sought to boost supply via subsidies and tax inducements. Mamdani has proposed publicly subsidizing 200,000 more affordable units. But even if he had the funding, such units typically cost far more than their purely private equivalents, in part because of all the attached conditions, such as using unionized labor

What about free buses? They’re already free to many riders—about 50% evade the fare, according to the MTA. But no-cost public transit tends to attract more crime, homelessness and soliciting. Officials in Portland, Ore., cited upticks in each when they ended fare-free rides downtown in 2010.

So what’s to be expected?

#1 Home prices and property tax revenue will decline in NYC.
#2 Home prices and property tax revenue will increase in the NYC suburbs.
#3 Home prices and property tax revenue will increase in the City of Boston and Philly.
#4 While Finance firms have been leaving NYC for decades, this process will now accelerate.
#5 Free public transit will cause many quality challenges that will surprise the Socialist Mayor.
#6 The rise of Work from Home will allow more firms and their workers to move outside the NYC jurisdiction and to more infrequently visit the high tax city for group meetings.
#7 Public Sector unions will negotiate more aggressively with the Socialist Mayor and this will increase NYC’s deficit challenge.
#8 The City’s bond rating will decline and this will mean that the City will borrow at a higher interest rate.
#9 NYC will become even more of a poverty magnet as poor U.S residents and poor international residents will be more likely to move to NYC.
#10 While a NYC Mayor can only serve for 8 years, the resulting policies will have a persistent impact on reducing the vibrancy of the NYC economy and its quality of life.
#11 The police will face extreme oversight and they will reduce their policing. While Murders will be investigating, other crimes will not be. This anticipated lack of deterrence will further reduce urban quality of life.
#12 Building on #11, the city’s nightlife will decline in quality as people are afraid to venture out at night and use the public space such as the parks.
#13 Real estate owners in NYC will invest less in maintaining the building capital stock. A “Detroit Effect” will emerge.
#14 Gifted public school programs will receive less $. The parents of these kids will be even more likely to suburbanize to move to a Scarsdale.
#15 As productive firms leave NYC, this disruption of idea production and intellectual interaction will reduce overall U.S economic growth.
Top | New | Old
BlueVeins · 22-25
Zohran mamdani's policy platform includes loosening regulations. You can read about it in his housing policy memo:

https://www.zohranfornyc.com/policies/housing-by-and-for-new-york

The number of rent-controlled apartments in NYC which are unfit for human habitation has declined from 43,000 to 26,000... out of almost one million total rent stabilized apartments in the city.

https://comptroller.nyc.gov/reports/accurately-assessing-and-effectively-addressing-vacancies-in-nycs-rent-stabilized-housing-stock/#:~:text=The%20vacancy%20rate%20among%20rent%20stabilized%20apartments,HVS%20to%200.98%25%20in%20the%202023%20HVS.&text=The%20number%20of%20rent%20stabilized%20units%20in,42%2C860%20in%202021%20to%2026%2C310%20in%202023

https://rentguidelinesboard.cityofnewyork.us/resources/faqs/rent-control/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%202023%20NYC,controlled%20and%20rent%20stabilized%20units.

Evidently, landlords are fixing old apartments, and less than 3% of them are currently in this state of disrepair you're so worried about.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@CedricH None of this is magic. Rent is the single biggest expense for most Americans, especially New Yorkers. By ratcheting down rental prices in one of the world's most expensive cities, you massively cut cost of living, which in turn gives regular people more money to spend on small businesses and nutritious food in the area. The main reason why New Yorkers perceive their cities as unsafe is that the subways are flooded with mentally-ill homeless people. Taking those struggling residents in, treating their conditions, and giving them a place to stay makes the urban environment a much more livable place.

I can personally attest to this, too. I've been on NYC's subway system. It's fast, it's efficient, and I didn't see anyone getting attacked or hurt. What I did see was human shit on the floor and creepy subway dwellers talking at me about the Jews and the Italians while I tried to look away. It's just uncomfortable, you should be able to ride the bus without being bothered by people with half the DSM-5 between their ears and nowhere to go.
CedricH · 22-25, M
@BlueVeins His proposals are based on flawed and magical thinking.
And we’ve seen the very same policies fail before in various Latin American countries and in Greece on a structural, national and systemic level, not just in one single mismanaged city.
Therefore, expecting actual positive outcomes will depend on your faith in magic.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@CedricH In Milwaukee, housing first policies led the city to have the lowest homelessness rate out of every city in the country. In Portugal, granting drug addiction treatment services to residents massively reduced its rate of drug deaths, to a point where it became the envy of the world. In New York City, rent control continues to save hardworking Americans thousands of dollars a year. The commodification of housing has turned cities like LA and Chicago into hives of homelessness, corruption, and crime with blisteringly high rents and not enough new construction to meet demand.

Citing Greece as an example of why rent controls can't work is comical. Greece failed because it is and always was a backwater of the EU that the Europeans thought they could infinitely lend to. It had inefficient public services, a massive overreliance on tourism, and very little tax revenue. New York City is an economic juggernaut that carries its entire region in terms of economic prosperity, and its tax base is nye unrivaled worldwide.
DealingWithTrouble · 41-45, M
Economists Support Zohran Mamdani’s Plan for New York City

https://www.thenation.com/article/economy/economists-zohran-mamdani-new-york-city/

I'll listen to the professional economists who agree his plans are practical and effective.
DealingWithTrouble · 41-45, M
@CedricH

My opinion is irrelevant,

You know, if you'd just stop there, you might have said something respectable. But then, if you were capable of that level of self-awareness you never would've made your original post in the first place.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This message was deleted by its author.
Too long; didn't read. I say give the guy a chance. Strangely enough, that's exactly what people on the right said about tRump!
AshleyMom4 · 41-45, F
@ElwoodBlues And they were wrong.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
CedricH · 22-25, M
@WestonTexan
The irony is this reaction is actually very similar to the reaction to Trump in 2016.

And in both cases the reaction is absolutely warranted.

PS: I‘ve been to NYC before but you’re completely right, I‘d never wanna live in any of the boroughs except perhaps in Staten Island. I‘d be comfortable in Orange county, Westchester county, Nassau county or Long Island in general. And that’s exactly where many successful and productive New Yorkers will be increasingly drawn to in the near future.

 
Post Comment