Who needs to really "obliterate" Iran's nuclear capability when you can just fantasize that it was done?

@wrule The satellite images do suggest there has been some damage as would be expected with bombs being dropped. The question is whether damage equals obliteration in the factual sense of the definition of the word.

@Ferise1 TRANSLATION: There is no evidence that Iran's nuclear capability has been "obliterated." A full analysis has not been completed. In fact, there is an indication the refined uranium was moved and while the plant equipment has been damaged, it still exists (so not obliterated). But the fantasy that it has been "obliterated" is attractive to those who choose to live in a fantasy world.

@MarkPaul but apparently they’ve been close to having the atomic bomb for decades so who knows what’s going on

@Ferise1 That's why "they" are enjoying the fantasy of "obliteration."