Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Nothing says 'America First' like Air Force One, brought to you by Qatar," Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer wrote on X.

Trump plans to accept luxury 747 from Qatar to use as Air Force One

Reuters
By Jeff Mason and Joseph Ax
May 12, 20253:04 AM CDT
Updated 7 hours ago.

May 11 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration intends to accept a Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab 747-8 airplane as a gift from the Qatari royal family that would be outfitted to serve as Air Force One, according to a source briefed on the matter.
The luxury plane, which would be one of the most valuable gifts ever received by the U.S. government, would eventually be donated to Trump's presidential library after he leaves office, the source said. A new commercial 747-8 costs approximately $400 million.

In a post on his social media site Truth Social late on Sunday, Trump appeared to confirm the proposal.
"So the fact that the Defense Department is getting a GIFT, FREE OF CHARGE, of a 747 aircraft to replace the 40 year old Air Force One, temporarily, in a very public and transparent transaction, so bothers the Crooked Democrats that they insist we pay, TOP DOLLAR, for the plane," he wrote.
Democrats and good government advocates said it was unethical and likely unconstitutional for Qatar to make such a gift.

"Nothing says 'America First' like Air Force One, brought to you by Qatar," Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer wrote on X. "It's not just bribery, it's premium foreign influence with extra legroom."
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement: "Any gift given by a foreign government is always accepted in full compliance with all applicable laws. President Trump's administration is committed to full transparency."

A Qatari spokesperson, Ali Al-Ansari, said in a statement that the possible transfer of an aircraft for temporary use as Air Force One was still under consideration between Qatar's Ministry of Defense and the U.S. Department of Defense and "no decision has been made".
ABC News was first to report the planned gift on Sunday.
Trump has expressed frustration at the delays in delivering two new 747-8 aircraft to serve as an updated Air Force One. During his first term, Trump had reached a deal with Boeing to deliver the jets in 2024. A U.S. Air Force official told Congress last week that Boeing had proposed finishing the planes by 2027.

Trump toured the Qatari-owned 747-8 in February when it was parked at Palm Beach International Airport in Florida, near his Mar-a-Lago resort. At the time, the White House said the president did so to get a better understanding of how the updated Air Force One planes would be configured.
In a statement, a spokesman for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, a good government organization based in Washington, questioned whether the transfer might violate the Constitution's ban on U.S. officials accepting gifts from foreign governments without congressional approval.
"This sure looks like a foreign country that the president has personal business dealings in giving the president a $400 million gift right before he meets with their head of state," the spokesman, Jordan Libowitz, said.

Trump is set to visit Qatar during a trip to the Middle East this week. The airplane will not be presented or accepted while Trump is in Qatar.
ABC reported, citing sources, that lawyers for the White House counsel's office and the Department of Justice had prepared an analysis concluding that it would be legal and constitutional for the Defense Department to accept the plane as a gift and later transfer it to Trump's presidential library.

Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Donna Bryson, Leslie Adler, David Gregorio, Michael Perry and Joe Bavier
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Sounds like it rests with Congress under the emoluments clause in the Constitution.
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@soar2newhighs Sounds like you didn't read the whole article!
@GerOttman What did I miss? Read the emoluments clause in Article 1 of the constitution . It rests with Congress as to whether this transaction is completed or not.
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@soar2newhighs Did you read the whole article or not? What does the article state in relation to this clause and why is not a factor? Or is this just a case of, "because I want it"?
@GerOttman I read the whole article and yes the constitution is cited in the post.
And whether this goes through or falls through; as they say I have no dog in this fight. Him getting or not getting a new AF-1 won’t affect me.
Pay me my pension, my social security and that’s my real concern.
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@soar2newhighs Oh... well sorry, but that's not what you said at first. My mistake for reading what you actually posted!
@GerOttman Well read my first post again. I said such an action is determined by Congress.
And what did I say at first?
GerOttman · 70-79, M
@soar2newhighs Oh, so we're back on this again. What about the pension? You jump around a lot, I think that's what I like about you. Never stay in one place too long!

Anyway, as cited in the article, the immoulant clause does not apply as applied in the stated situation. So why would I care about it, and more to the point, why do you care so much about it?
@GerOttman You’re taking this way too seriously. He either gets the a/c or doesn’t. Bottom line, end of discussion.
GerOttman · 70-79, M