What public health experts say about Trump is true or false?

@SunshineGirl The US hasn't stopped, nor will it. It merely is changing the way it will be done. Nothing more.

@nudistsueaz That remains to be seen. However, for the moment more than 90% of the overseas aid budget has been pulled and millions of the world's poorest and most vulnerable are now at risk of dying from wholly preventable diseases.

@SunshineGirl It won't resume until the tax payers know where it is going and what is being used for once it is there. Plain and simple, accountability. You do bring up a good point. What did these countries do before the tax payers started helping?

@SunshineGirl We really don't know whether there are benefits because there is no accountability as would reasonably be expected.

Beyond the lack of accountability, there is no continuity or no predictable continuity.

Why do Democrats and their enablers ignore the need for accountability and continuity when both are vital in fulfilling the intent.

Whether US Aid for starving children in XYZ is going to feed the children or into the pockets of politicians or just randomly scattered into the winds no one really knows. Why so resistant to knowing? .

@Heartlander
@nudistsueaz

Marco Rubio said that the initiatives were terminated because they dud not serve, or actively harmed American interests. The letter that was sent to NGOs infprming them of the termination of 10,000 contracts stated this was being done "for the convenience and the interests of the US government". No mention was ever made about alleged corruption.

If you are interested in "accountability", here are some external perspectives on the likely impact of the cuts:

In Congo, aid group Action Against Hunger will stop treating tens of thousands of malnourished children from May, which the charity said will put the children in “mortal danger.”

In Ethiopia, food assistance stopped for more than 1 million people, according to the Tigray Disaster Risk Management Commission. The Ministry of Health was also forced to terminate the contract of 5,000 workers across the country focused on HIV and malaria prevention, vaccinations and helping vulnerable women deal with the trauma of war.

In Senegal, the biggest malaria project closed. It distributed bed nets and medication to tens of thousands of people, according to a USAID worker who was not authorized to speak to the media. Maternal and child health and nutrition services also closed. They provided lifesaving care to tens of thousands of pregnant women and treatment that would have prevented and treated acute malnutrition.

In South Sudan, the International Rescue Committee closed a project providing access to quality health care and nutrition services to more than 115,000 people.

In Colombia, program shuttered by the Norwegian Refugee Council left 50,000 people without lifesaving support including in the northeast, where growing violence has precipitated a once-in-a-generation humanitarian crisis. It included food, shelter, clean water and other basic items for people displaced in the region.

In war-torn Sudan, 90 communal kitchens closed in the capital, Khartoum, leaving more than half a million people without consistent access to food, according to the International Rescue Committee.

In Bangladesh, 600,000 women and children will lose access to critical maternal health care, protection from violence, reproductive health services and other lifesaving care, according the United Nations Population Fund.
In Mali, critical aid, such as access to water, food and health services was cut for more than 270,000 people, according to an aid group that did not want to be named for fear of reprisal.

In northern Burkina Faso, more than 400,000 people lost access to services such as water. Services for gender-based violence and child protection for thousands are also no longer available, according to an aid group that did not want to be named for fear of reprisal.

In Somalia, 50 health centers servicing more than 19,000 people a month closed because health workers are not being paid, according to Alright, a U.S aid group.

In Ukraine, cash-based humanitarian programs that reached 1 million people last year were suspended, according to the spokesperson for the U.N. secretary-general.

In Afghanistan, hundreds of mobile health teams and other services were suspended, affecting 9 million people, according to the U.N. spokesperson.

In Syria, aid programs for some 2.5 million people in the country’s northeast stopped providing services, according to the U.N. secretary-general. Also in the north, a dozen health clinics, including the main referral hospital for the area, have shut down, said Doctors Without Borders.

In Kenya, more than 600,000 people living in areas plagued by drought and persistent acute malnutrition will lose access to lifesaving food and nutrition support, according to Mercy Corps.

In Haiti, 13,000 people have lost access to nutritional support, according to Action Against Hunger. The cuts will affect in total at least 550,000 people who were receiving aid.

In Thailand, hospitals helping some 100,000 refugees from Myanmar have shuttered, according to aid group Border Consortium.

In Nigeria, 25,000 extremely malnourished children will stop receiving food assistance by April, according to the International Rescue Committee.

In the Philippines, a program to improve access to disaster warning systems for disabled people was stopped, according to Humanity & Inclusion.

In Vietnam, a program assisting disabled people through training caregivers and providing at home medical care stopped, according to Humanity & Inclusion.

In Yemen, 220,000 displaced people will lose access to critical maternal health care, protection from violence, rape treatment and other lifesaving care, according the United Nations Population Fund.

Source: AP News.

@SunshineGirl The Associated Press is not the stamp of honesty, nor the conclusive authenticator of what will happen "if" or "when" the US cuts off funding, whether forever or until someone supplies evidence and accountability.

The PRESS and the NEWS are not one and the same in the US.

The causes you listed may be funded in part by US Aid but I seriously doubt that any are managed by agencies of the US government. They likely have funding from other sources and in case you missed my "continuity" comment, the US government is not a dependable source of funds for charitable, outreach programs; and to rely on the US for 100% of there funds would be both risky and irresponsible. When responsible funders issue RFPs, buried in the fine print is often a requirement that responders receive 25% or 50% of their funds from other sources. For the US government to be granting funds without that stipulation is an invitation for fraud.