Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Taxpayers could be forced to fund Trump foe Letitia James’ legal defense if Dem budget item passes

Language in a new budget bill up for a vote later Wednesday evening could put New York taxpayers on the hook for state Attorney General Letitia James' legal fees in a fraud case being brought against her by the Trump administration.

Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul issued her proposed $254 billion budget last week, and the state legislature is set to begin voting on it as soon as Wednesday. Part of what state legislators will be voting on includes the state operations section of the budget.

That section, according to a draft copy provided to Fox News Digital by the state Republican Party, includes draft language which – if approved – would compel taxpayers to provide the money for a legal defense fund that, while James is not named in the bill, would theoretically cover the New York attorney general's legal costs pertaining to fraud allegations brought against her by the Trump administration's Federal Housing Finance Agency.

The draft language, compiled by the Democrat-controlled executive branch, Senate majority and Assembly majority, would set aside $10 million for elected officials in the state to use for their legal defense when the case is in direct response to the official's exercise of their duties.

James' attorney, Abbe Lowell, who was obtained for her by the New York State Attorney General's Office, characterized the Trump administration's mortgage fraud claims against James as "political retribution" for her decision to go after Donald Trump over allegations he falsified business documents to obtain favorable business positions.

According to the draft language of the New York operations budget bill, a state official would be permitted to use money from the legal defense fund if the official has previously had interactions with the U.S. government or a U.S. government official in the course of their official duties. There are additional criteria which would also apply to James, particularly when considering her former case brought against Trump that led to the first ever felony conviction of a U.S. president.

The sources who provided the operations budget draft language said it should be made publicly available some time Wednesday.

"Donald Trump promised a vicious revenge tour when he ran in 2024, and he’s put Attorney General James at the top of his list, and we’re ready to respond to these attacks," a spokesperson for James told Fox News Digital on Wednesday. The spokesperson added that James plans to use both private and public state funds to mount her defense.

Meanwhile, New York GOP Chair Ed Cox told the New York Post that "this is what corruption looks like."

"Political insiders rigging the system to protect their own, while hardworking families get shortchanged," Cox accused in a statement to the New York Post. "Tish James used her office to wage partisan lawfare against her political opponents, and now New Yorkers are footing the bill for the consequences."

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Tяump is suing Ms James for what Ms James did as part of her official duties. Of COURSE Ms James' legal defense will be officially funded!! OF COURSE!!!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues So purchasing property in Virginia is suddenly part of the official duties of the new york state attorney, right?
@sunsporter1649 Since when is it a crime to purchase property in any given state?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues Well, you left-wing nut-jobs do have a history of marrying family members.

@sunsporter1649 Since when is it a crime to purchase property in any given state?




UPDATE 2 hrs later




So you can't identify any crime committed by Ms James, much less why federal DoJ would be interested?? Good to know.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@ElwoodBlues that’s what people said about her charges against Orange . What was the crime ?
@AthrillatheHunt, regarding tRump, asks
What was the crime ?
In New York State, it's against the law to falsify business records. Has been since the 1960s. That's tRump's crime.

"The law under which Ms. James sued, known by its shorthand 63(12), requires the plaintiff to show a defendant’s conduct was deceptive. If that standard is met, a judge can impose severe punishment, including forfeiting the money obtained through fraud. Ms. James has also used this law against the oil company ExxonMobil, the tobacco brand Juul and the pharma executive Martin Shkreli."

Among the documents Trump falsified were SFCs (Statements of Financial Condition). He did that partly by feeding false info to and concealing liabilities from his accounting firm, Mazars. That's why Mazars dumped Trump back in Feb 2022.

The statute Trump violated is New York Executive Law EXC § 63(12). The purpose is to take away the incentive for cheating by forcing disgorgement of profits made from cheating. If a scam artist makes $350 mil from cheating and you only fine him $50 mil, that makes cheating VERY profitable - you can't deny it.

Trump falsified business records involving:
Trump Tower triplex apartment
40 Wall St
Vornado Realty Trust
Trump Park Ave
Seven Springs
Briarcliffe
Mar-a-Lago
Trump National Golf Club LA
Aberdeen Golf Course

Trump is thus required by law to disgorge profits made from these falsifications.

For complete details, see
https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2024/02/Judge-Engoron-ruling-in-Trump-New-York-civil-fraud-case.pdf




"Valuing occupied residences as if vacant, valuing restricted land as if unrestricted, valuing an apartment as if it were triple its actual size, valuing property many times the amount of concealed appraisals, valuing planned buildings as if completed and ready to rent, valuing golf courses with brand premium while claiming not to, and valuing restricted funds as cash, are not subjective differences of opinion, they are misstatements at best and fraud at worst," the judge wrote.



sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues Is not there something called the “statute of limitations “?