Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

America’s richest university sues US government to keep taxpayer money coming



Okay – “the richest” university would be Harvard, in case anyone needed help with this low-level Jeopardy question. Harvard is terrified that the government might reduce or cut off their taxpayer funded welfare. That would be a threat to $2.2 billion immediately, and around $9 billion in total. See link below.

Harvard has an endowment of $53 billion. Endowments are kind of like an IRA. Special tax rules, and your bank account keeps growing, year after year. Harvard is richer than Rupert Murdoch and Melissa French Gates – combined. You’d be outraged if Rupert Murdoch was getting billion dollar checks from the US government, wouldn’t you?

Here’s Harvard’s specific complaint: they refuse appoint an independent advisor to help ensure their classes and course material are “diverse”. Diverse is in quotes because it’s Harvard’s SPECIFIC objection. Harvard is now apparently against DEI. Last year they were for it. I guess the wrong kind of diversity must be resisted at all costs. It could be an existential threat to a university.

This case, of course, is probably going to end up in the US Supreme Court. Where four of the Justices graduated from Harvard Law School: Ketanji Brown Jackson, Gorsuch, Elena Kagan, and Chief Justice Roberts. Another 4 justices graduated from Yale, Harvard’s historic rival. This case could be better than the annual Harvard-Yale football game. (Harvard usually wins that. A rivalry that's been happening since 1875 - 150 years).

Harvard’s attorneys and administrators have another complaint: “Government should not dictate what universities teach”. Yeah, tell that to the politicians who are screaming bloody murder about the impending death of the US Department of Education. The DOE's sole mission was to dictate public school curriculums.

Of course, the Trump administration has a different story: this is about the recent pro-Hamas/antisemitic protests on campus. Replete with vandalism, arson, interruption of classes, cancellation of exams, and intimidation of students suspected of being Jewish. Well, I can see how protecting the rights of a religious minority and ending violent protests would sound alarm bells to a college sitting on a $53 billion bank account.

This wouldn't be the first time Harvard was on the wrong side of history. Until the state of Massachusetts outlawed slavery in the 18th century, Harvard faculty and staff owned dozens of slaves.

I'm just sayin' . . .

First Thing: Harvard sues Trump administration over grants freeze

Harvard University endowment - Wikipedia
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Harvard’s attorneys and administrators have another complaint: “Government should not dictate what universities teach”. Yeah, tell that to the politicians who are screaming bloody murder about the impending death of the US Department of Education. The DOE's sole mission was to dictate public school curriculums.
(Emphasis added.)

No. Again, you go off on a rant.

From the wikipedia

A) Proper abbreviation

Its official abbreviation is ED ("DOE" refers to the United States Department of Energy) but is also abbreviated informally as "DoEd".[8]

B) Purpose
The department identifies four key functions:[15]

1) Establishing policies on federal financial aid for education and distributing as well as monitoring those funds.

2) Collecting data on America's schools and disseminating research.

3) Focusing national attention on key issues in education and making recommendations for education reform.

4) Prohibiting discrimination and ensuring equal access to education.

The Department of Education is a member of the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness[16] and works with federal partners to ensure proper education for homeless and runaway youth in the United States.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@SomeMichGuy thanks for making my point! The average parent in small town amerca does NOT want the federal government . . .

1 - establishing policies for local schools

2 - collecting data on the pupils, their parents, their medical records, etc

3 - making top down decisions as to what the "key issues in education are", at least without exensive public input.

4 - the DOJ is charged with enforcing america's laws. Not the department of education. Each federal agency is not a private police force.
@SusanInFlorida You apparently can't read, because your eliding of 1 & 2, and your commentary on 3 is based upon what? The data collected in 2 points to those issues.

But if you don't like the Federal government trying to improve education, you ought to really hate Texas for making textbooks used everywhere crazy, and Florida for making ahistorical fiction as "history" straight out of the "Lost Cause" playbook.

And as for 4, the Federal government can't discriminate, and education is fundamental to free societies, so equal access as an obvious consequence of the Equal Protection Clause is a MANDATE of the Constitution, so the ED is following that mandate.