beckyromero · 36-40, F
I say, yes. We already have "term limits." They are called "elections."
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@beckyromero Yeah, that's what they thought when Roosevelt ran for his fourth term.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Would rather eliminate the 10th amendment outright.
A state is a concept, not a person to have rights!
Yet you're talking impossibilities anyway. There's not a consensus to change anything in the constitution!
Might as well ask for executive orders to be limited to six months. And be ratified by Congress with a ⅔rds majority for anything further.
Oh, you can't have a real democracy can you?
A state is a concept, not a person to have rights!
Yet you're talking impossibilities anyway. There's not a consensus to change anything in the constitution!
Might as well ask for executive orders to be limited to six months. And be ratified by Congress with a ⅔rds majority for anything further.
Oh, you can't have a real democracy can you?