Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

DOGE's 'wall of receipts' is a farce.

Always wrong': NYT reporter takes wrecking ball to DOGE's 'wall of receipts'

By Brrad Reed/Raw Story
March 18, 2025 3:56PM ET

New York Times reporter David Fahrenthold on Tuesday took a wrecking ball to efforts by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency to demonstrate how much money they are saving American taxpayers.

Writing on Bluesky, Fahrenthold walked through the ways in which Musk and his DOGE team make fundamental errors in tallying up the purported savings they're notching up as they conduct a slash-and-burn campaign against the federal workforce.

In fact, Fahrenthold has found that "the largest item" on DOGE's list of receipts "has always been wrong."

When the Wall of Receipts was first posted, Elon Musk's group said its largest savings was an $8 billion cut at ICE," he explained. "But that was a typo in government records. DOGE reduced the savings to $8 million, then zero."

But the DOGE follies didn't stop there.

"Then DOGE said its largest savings had come from terminating a USAID contract worth $655 million," he wrote. "But they had triple-counted the same cancellation, and also greatly over-estimated what that cancellation was worth. That savings, too, was eventually reduced to $0."

The reporter then cited a particularly eye-opening example of DOGE inteptitude.

"Next, DOGE said its largest savings came from cancelling a $1.9B contract at the IRS," explained Fahrenthold. "But that contract had been cancelled when Joe Biden was president. DOGE later deleted the claim."

The bottom line, argues Fahrenthold, is that "nobody benefits if DOGE is using bad data."

"Won't it be harder to find real waste or fraud if their data is plagued by errors?" he asked.
Top | New | Old
trollslayer · 46-50, M
Over the long term, DOGE will cost more than it saves. Every time this “sledgehammer” approach is used for cost reduction whether it be in private industry or government the net result is opposite the intent.

Where I live the state government took this approach back around 2010-2012 due to budget shortfalls. It saved money for that years’ budget, but the neglect was paid for in subsequent years.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
Why are you soi opposed to limiting the amount of waste, fraud, and abuse of the taxpayers money?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@JSul3

- $2 million for Moroccan pottery classes

- $2 million promoting tourism to Lebanon

- $20 million for a Sesame Street show in Iraq

- Sending Ukranians to Paris Fashion Week

- $1 million to help disabled people in Tajikistan become climate leaders

- $15 million for 'contraceptives and condoms’ in Taliban-Controlled Afghanistan

-$45 million scholarship program for students in Burma.

-$25,000 award entitled “Empowering LGBTQIA+ Refugees in Greece”

– $10M for “Mozambique voluntary medical male circumcision”

– $9.7M for UC Berkeley to develop “a cohort of Cambodian youth with enterprise driven skills”

– $2.3M for “strengthening independent voices in Cambodia”

– $32M to the Prague Civil Society Centre

– $40M for “gender equality and women empowerment hub”

– $14M for “improving public procurement” in Serbia

– $486M to the “Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening,” including $22M for
“inclusive and participatory political process” in Moldova and $21M for voter turnout in India

– $29M to “strenghening political landscape in Bangladesh”

– $20M for “fiscal federalism” in Nepal

– $19M for “biodiversity conversation” in Nepal

– $1.5M for “voter confidence” in Liberia

– $14M for “social cohesion” in Mali

– $2.5M for “inclusive democracies in Southern Africa”

– $47M for “improving learning outcomes in Asia”

- $265k for a “food and nutrition service 3 day leadership retreat in Atlanta”

- $30K for “Malaysia study tour facilitation services”

-$324,671 grant for “Increasing DEIA Programming for Integrated Pest Management”

– $2M to develop “sustainable recycling models” to “increase socio-economic cohesion among marginalized
communities of Kosovo Roma, Ashkali, and Egypt”

-$60M for "Indigenous Peoples and Afro-Colombian empowerment"

- $74M for "inclusive justice" in Colombia

- $79M for "primary literacy" in Kenya

- $37M for "female empowerment" in Colombia

- $8M to "Reduce stigma, discrimination, and violence against LGBTQI+ communities" in Lesotho

- $3.3M for "being LGBTQI in the Caribbean"

- $250k to increase "Vegan Local Climate Action Innovation" in Zambia

-$1.7M for the “China Health and Retirement Longitudinal study” at Peking University in Beijing, China

-$135K for a research grant to China Medical University in Shenyang, China

-$142K for “using telehealth to improve access to gender-affirming care”

-$1.3M for “transforming health for gender-diverse young adults”

-$120K for “personalized 3-D avatar tool development” focused on “gender identities”

-$400K for researching “sources of minority stress and alcohol consumption” among “adults who report uncertainty
about their sexual orientation”

-$160K for researching “racialized sexual discrimination” among “young sexual minority men of color”

-$241K for “an intervention to promote healthy relationships among transgender and gender expansive youth”

- $100K for Vanderbilt University to study “social networks” among “sexual and gender minorities”

- $37K for the University of Houston to study “fear of deportation” in “Latinx young adults”

- $681K for the University of Pennsylvania to study “social media anti-vaping messages” among “sexual and gender minority
teens”

- $225K for the University of Colorado to study the “effects of hormones on headaches in transmasculine adolescents”

- $620K for “an LGB+ inclusive teen pregnancy prevention program for transgender boys”

- $699K for studying “cannabis use” among “sexual minority gender diverse individuals”

- $740K for examining “social networks” among “black and Latino sexual minority men in New Jersey”

- $50K for assessing “sexual health” among “LGTBQ+ Latinx youth in an agricultural community”

- $75K for researching “structural racism”
JSul3 · 70-79
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@JSul3 tabasco
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
And you trust nyt. They also had proof of Russia Russia Russia
JSul3 · 70-79
@Patriot96 Suggest you read the GOP led Senate Intel Report.

Why is Trump giving in to everything Putin wants in Ukraine?
Putin invades a sovereign nation...kills thousands of innocent men, women, and children...continues to do so....kidnaps thousands of children then Trump ends the tracking of these kids who will never be reunited with their parents...takes land in Ukraine....and so:
Stop the fighting! Let Putin keep the land and all of the stolen children....and what does Ukraine get in return? Zero.

 
Post Comment