The 3 types of interventionist schools of thought in the US

[image/video deleted]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

FreddieUK · 70-79, M

@CedricH Excellent work. That must have taken some time. It's interesting that you've chosen to avoid using the term 'left' altogether. I think that's probably wise in view of how that is so misunderstood in the USA in particular.

I'm also interested that you decide that views on Trump from people I would put in that column range so widely from supportive to skeptical. So far it has been difficult to find people who are openly speaking against what he's doing.

CedricH · M

@FreddieUK Under an hour. And thank you, I appreciate it.

I'm also interested that you decide that views on Trump from people I would put in that column range so widely from supportive to skeptical

Could you clarify that? I don’t understand the question, if it’s a question.

FreddieUK · 70-79, M

@CedricH I mean that I would have expected to see fully supportive.

CedricH · M

@FreddieUK You‘re referring to the hawkish, nationalist, conservative individuals? None of them is fully supportive of Trump, those who have spoken out in favor of him also try to nudge Trump‘s foreign policy in a direction that‘s disconnected from the MAGA movement and Trump‘s personal instincts and inclinations.

FreddieUK · 70-79, M

@CedricH Interesting nuance that I hadn't picked up on.

CedricH · M

@FreddieUK I still can‘t decide if I find some of them useful - as Trojan horses - to keep Trump from being exclusively influenced by neo-isolationist, anti-American figures like Vance, Musk, Elbridge Colby and Tulsi Gabbard or if they‘re just helping to broaden the permission structure for Trump skeptics to vote for him.