Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

U.S. Control Over Russia Is FAR More Important to U.S. Security Than Control Over Greenland.

So, President Trump. Shouldn't you be calling your buddy Vlady instead of harassing the Danish Prime Minister?
Top | New | Old
CedricH · M
That‘s the irony of it all. Leaving aside the fact that Greenland isn’t for sale, that it is an autonomous region of a liberal and democratic NATO ally, Denmark, and that the US could instead negotiate with Copenhagen about the creation of new US military bases across the vast arctic territory, the strategic value of Greenland stems from its proximity to Russia.

Rather than undermining US relations with governments that are staunchly aligned with the the goal of countering the Russian menace, pushing for a new, much more comprehensive appropriations bill for Ukraine‘s defense and future offensives would be immeasurably more effective and realistic as a policy action to gain a strategic advantage over Russia.
Trump's talking about pulling out of Europe and letting them do Ukraine vs Russia without the USA, saying he doesn't care about Europe and wants to focus on Asia. He's finished and gets up satisfied, Europe is bleeding on the floor - her choice! Buckles his belt and moves away.
Europe will beg murka to stay! Does that ever work,?
@beckyromero "Too Much and Never Enough; How my Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man" Mary Trump
trollslayer · 46-50, M
No. The Danish PM doesn't have the PP tape. Putin does.
Trump is a Russian asset. Russia would benefit if Trump contrroled Greenland. Greenland has a Military Base that helps protect Europe from Russia.
Zonuss · 46-50, M
Greenland is about resources and property. They also play a part in the military 🪖
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
But its easier to bully "Daneland"😷
Wireman · 31-35, M
Nato can't even control Russia!
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment