Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

A "CAUKUS" Treaty, modeled after AUKUS, would supply Canada with nuclear-powered submarines to enforce protection of the Northwest Passage.

Canada has long sought recognition of the Northwest Passage as its sole sovereign waters.

This wasn't much of an issue when the Passage was frozen over nearly all year round.

But what ignorant U.S. policy decision makers in past decades failed to see is that by refusing to Canadian sovereignty and saying the Passage is international waters, we've not only been saying the Chinese would have the unequivocal right to send its large container ships to the Eastern U.S. seaboard and to Europe by a much shorter route (making their goods even cheaper and their economy stronger to our detriment), but it would also open the Passage to Russian ballistic missile submarines and significantly cut the time for them to knock out U.S. missile silos in the northern Great Plains.

Instead of Trump's foolish statements wanting to make Canada part of the U.S., once he takes office he should:

1. Immediately change United States policy to quickly recognize full Canadian sovereignty over the Northwest Passage.

2. Revise the mutual defense agreement with Canada (NORAD - North American Aerospace Defense Command) to include a sea-borne component whereas the United States Navy would contribute to the defense of the Northwest Passage.

3. In partnership with the United Kingdom (and patterned after the AUKUS Treaty), the United States would help Canada to develop and build a dozen nuclear-powered submarines, allowing Canada in time to take over much of the defense of the Northwest Passage and strenghten NATO's defense in the Arctic.

This new policy would also help repair the damage in U.S. - Canadian relations done by Trump with his idiotic statements regarding statehood and tariffs.



About Me:
https://similarworlds.com/beckyromero/info

Comprehensive Analysis of My Voting History, Political and National Security Positions:
https://similarworlds.com/politics/5213067-Comprehensive-Analysis-of-Becky-Romeros-Political-Views

Index of My Stories and Questions:
https://similarworlds.com/813725-I-White-Board/2509132-Index-of-All-My-Stories-and-Questions-The-topics


This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
War is defense! Murkans are the good guys!
Your theory that you must be able to kill me from far away to be safe is truly amazing! Never let people question it - it's a house of cards.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Roundandroundwego

It would also help protect the Arctic environment from development, massive cargo containers and oil spills.

At least on OUR side of the Arctic. Can't say what the Ruskies will do on THEIR side.
@beckyromero NATO is definitely Earth's greatest carbon emitter. They're just trying to help the Arctic.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Roundandroundwego

Nuclear subs won't emit carbon.

But the cargo shipping industry is responsible for about 3% of all of global greenhouse gas emissions.

Do we really want that happening in the Arctic, where temperatures are already rising faster than the rest of the world?