How significant is the recent escalation between NATO and Russia?

NATO is now allowing the use of American and British missiles in Russian territory. In September, Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer decided, after discussions, not to allow this. We can assume the reason is wanting to avoid escalation. Putin issued a very clear warning and they appeared to listen.

What has changed since then? It has only been two months. Russia continues to do well, which is not a change as Russian military has been doing well for over a year. Why is Biden, before he leaves office, allowing Ukraine to use these missiles? He knows what the potential consequences are. Starmer also knows what the consequences are. The deep state know the consequences. This can only be a way to try to sabotage Trump's presidency.

Do you think this escalation is significant? What do you think will happen?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Gibbon · 70-79, M

Biden wants to make things as worse as he can before Trump takes office. He doesn't give a damn about the situation he puts the US in.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@Gibbon Anticipatory excuses?

SW-User

@anythingoes477 America is lucky to have Tulsi Gabbard. She wants to leave Syria alone and is not hostile to Russia. Why do you people want to keep the wars going? You need to stay out of Syria, stay out of Ukraine, leave Russia and every other country alone and mind your own business.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@SW-User America didn't invade Ukraine - that was russia. In fact, russia has been invading Ukraine for the last ten years

You apparently feel that fprussia should be allowed to continue murdering Ukraine's men, women, children, and babies.

News for russia - consequences are coming.

SW-User

@newjaninev2 Russians live in Ukraine and have for more than a thousand years. If it had not been for the revolution in 2014, the second revolution in Ukraine instigated by US, Russian military would not have entered Ukraine. NATO has been hostile to Russia and US is seeking to weaken Russia. It does not want an independent Russia, and has no care for Ukraine. All US wants from Ukraine is to use it to weaken Russia, to exploit its resources and use it as another satellite.

No consequences are coming for Russia. The world is more concerned about Israel and the arrest warrant for Netanyahu. Ukraine is losing the war, as you have been told numerous times in this post. Trump is very likely to end military aid to Ukraine, but if he does not, Ukraine will still lose. Did you read the articles I linked you? These are western media outlets telling us that Ukraine is losing. It is running out of men. They have been encircled in Kursk and are getting pushed out. Russia has gained more territory. The numbers say it all. What dreamland are you living in?

ImNotHungry · 36-40, M

@newjaninev2

News for russia - consequences are coming.

nice wet dream

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@SW-User

Russians live in Ukraine and have for more than a thousand years

Chinese live in russia and have done for much more than 1,000 years. I rather feel they're thinking of reminding you about that 😀

After ten years of lies, theft, rape, and murder, russia is infesting 18% of Ukraine's territory.

730,000 dead orcs, and russia's economy circling the drain.

Consequences are coming.