Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

How significant is the recent escalation between NATO and Russia?

NATO is now allowing the use of American and British missiles in Russian territory. In September, Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer decided, after discussions, not to allow this. We can assume the reason is wanting to avoid escalation. Putin issued a very clear warning and they appeared to listen.

What has changed since then? It has only been two months. Russia continues to do well, which is not a change as Russian military has been doing well for over a year. Why is Biden, before he leaves office, allowing Ukraine to use these missiles? He knows what the potential consequences are. Starmer also knows what the consequences are. The deep state know the consequences. This can only be a way to try to sabotage Trump's presidency.

Do you think this escalation is significant? What do you think will happen?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
The military industrial complex, central banks, and globalists all know the gravy train of US tax $$$ comes to an end when Trump takes office. The missile attacks represent a desperate attempt on their part to get Russia to escalate the conflict with a retaliatory response, hoping to inflame the public into accepting a global war. Handing the Trump administration WWIII also distracts from the immigration and prosecutory issues DC is facing. The good news is that Putin isn't stupid. He knows exactly what the globalists are trying to do.
carpediem · 61-69, M
@BizSuitStacy I agree wholeheartedly with your analysis