Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Hey, Secretary of Defense nominee Pete Hegseth . . . I just found something you can cut in the Pentagon budget.



Photo above - World War 2 ends with Japan's surrender on a US battleship. The US is now bringing back a pair of 1940's era battleships to bolster our nation's defenses. Not a joke . . . for real.

Isn’t it enough that we have ELEVEN aircraft carrier groups? Each with an entourage of more than dozen support ships guarding the big enchilada? Carriers can't survive 5 minutes without submarines, guided missile cruisers, destroyers, frigates, and who knows what else.

Now a pair of 80 year old battleships are returning to duty. Commissioned in 1942-44, the Wisconsin and Iowa. Entered active duty before the end of World War 2. Before the invention of broadcast television and the hula hoop.

Generals (and admirals) always spend their careers preparing to re-fight the last war. Apparently we are getting ready for a repeat of World War 2. The Wisconsin and Iowa are equipped with 18 inch guns, the largest ever fitted to any ship. These behemoths can hit targets up to 24 miles away. Unless someone fires a cruise missile in their direction first - range 1,000 miles. Remember to watch out for torpedoes, too!

The Russians are using legacy "capital ships" against Ukraine. But a Russian heavy cruiser was destroyed almost immediately by a homebuilt Ukrainian drone. Apparently, Russia thinks it’s refighting World War 2 also.

Attention please, outgoing Biden administration (and incoming Trump administration). World War 3 has already begun. The weapons are hacking, infrastructure attacks, disabling GPS and cellular networks. Using cheap orbital payloads to kill military satellites which have no defense, and no way to shoot back. Puleeze . .. we don’t need two battleships, and the flotilla of support vehicles each will need.

The pentagon has 490 generals, and at least 62 admirals. The incoming Trump administration plans to “transform” America’s defense by forcing a bunch of them to retire. I humbly suggest that leaving the Iowa and Wisconsin in mothballs go to the top of the our spending cuts.

I’m just sayin’ . . .

Iowa and Wisconsin Battleships Return to Service: A Controversial Move Amid Evolving Naval Strategy
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
jehova · 31-35, M
Stuck in ww2 nostalgia?, Definitely. Trump dodged the draft for vietnam yet many of his supports served in ww2? Idk my point is only ancient equipment will only endanger current combatants. Were we to retrofit these old vessels they still move slowly. Have no stealth and its all to keep the ww2 veterans in support of the current ongoing war.
SusanInFlorida · 31-35, F
@jehova your thread hijacking attempt is noted. kudos.

having no luck attracting readers to your own anti-trump posts? the best you can do is completely avoid discussing whether resurrecting WW2 battleships serves and legitimate function?
jehova · 31-35, M
@SusanInFlorida i commented its counterproductive due to inefficency and lack of technology (outdated equipment). Its being used to keep baby boomers and ww2 veterans engaged its not anti trump its anti never ending war.
Hows that tunnel vision treating you?