Is Kamala Intentionally Trying To Lose With This Ad?

[media=https://youtu.be/Hk4ueY9wVtA]

This is reminding me of that Gillette shaving ad attacking men.

Are feminists really this deeply delusional and clueless about men's mindset? Absolutely no insight to our thought process?

I think this ad will be played for centuries in political science classes as to what not to do in a campaign ad. It's bizarre and farcical. WTF?

Kamala isn't even running against conservatives, but a made up simulacrum of self delusional, incestuous debates the left have had over the years with themselves in all women feminist studies circles, with no imput from reality. This is self serving for reinforcing their own identity of who the opposition is, not addressing the opposition, because no man is looking at this thinking this is relevant to him. We are all staring open mouth wondering who the heck these crazy people are and where did they come from.

You don't run for president with this sort of awareness, you run for the psych ward to get medicated. So sad.

Kamala's support from men has undoubtedly just started to snowball against her.

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

LeopoldBloom · M

The Harris campaign didn’t put this ad out. It’s from a super-PAC. By law, PACs are forbidden from coordinating with the campaign, so this didn’t even have Harris’ approval. She probably saw the ad the same time you did. It also goes on far too long at a minute and a half. 30 seconds would have been plenty. So your criticism should be directed at whatever group thought this ad was a good idea.

I don’t think she’ll lose any male voters over this, either. For all we know, this was put out by a pro-Trump PAC. The ad cuts off right at the end, so I couldn’t tell who released it. I did notice that it’s on the ultra-conservative New York Post. I suspect that this was released by an anti-Harris PAC to elicit the exact reaction you had: “OMG look at that crazy Harris, trying to appeal to conservative men by showing a left-wing simulacrum of them.”

Be careful, there’s a lot of stuff flying around now deliberately designed to mislead you. Harris is still the best choice compared to the senile orange traitor and rapist.

MistyCee

You don't run for president with this sort of awareness, you run for the psych ward to get medicated. So sad.

Kamala's support from men has undoubtedly just started to snowball against her.

I can and do doubt it, and think you need to account for the fact that she's running against someone who should be in a psych ward, along with an awful lot of people that support him.

Is it over the top and offensive, maybe, but it gets your attention, and it's not nearly as offensive as lies like cats and dogs, etc

To be clear, I'm not a fan of this, but I'm not so sure this ad is an awful move that will surely doom her campaign or go down as the worst ad move in history, even.

It's gutsy, and maybe even a little risky, but she is running against a man with hardcore "knuckedragger" support and shaming a few men who aren't quite so hardcore into voting doesn't seem entirely stupid.

Motzu

@MistyCee For everyman she wins over, she'll lose twenty.

MaBalzEsHari · M

How completely far can you possibly miss a point? ;-) ;-) ;-)

samueltyler2 · 80-89, M

Where did you find this? Where is the tag line who paid for and approved it?

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

View 6 more replies »

Motzu

@Handfull1 I never remotely said that.

Handfull1 · 61-69, F

@Motzu when I asked you who it’s insulting, you replied “Kamala?”

What did you mean then?

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

Add a comment...