Consider for a moment...

If, God forbid, anything were to happen to the President, who, based on last night's performance, would you rather see step in to the White House? Vance or Walz?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

RedBaron · M

God has nothing to do with it.

But Biden is president for almost four more months, so it would be Harris.

daydeeo · 61-69, M

@RedBaron Congratulations on avoiding the question entirely.

RedBaron · M

@daydeeo There’s no question to be asked.

Vance is not VP. Harris is.

If anything happened to the president, it would be Biden, so Harris would step in.

If Harris takes office in January and something happens, it would be Walz.

If Trump takes office in January and something happens, it would be Vance.

We don’t have a choice in the matter.

But congratulations on asking an entirely meaningless question. At least you got to post something.

daydeeo · 61-69, M

@RedBaron OK. Well, congratulations on missing the point, then.

RedBaron · M

@daydeeo You had no real point to miss.

But go ahead, keep trying to convince yourself that you did.

daydeeo · 61-69, M

@RedBaron I wasn't trying to make a point. I simply asked a question, hoping to elicit some thoughtful response.

RedBaron · M

@daydeeo But you failed to recognize that there is no choice since we only have one president and one VP at a time.