Newsom Quietly Bans Voter ID Rules in California
In a controversial move that has intensified the debate over election integrity, California Governor Gavin Newsom has somewhat quietly signed legislation prohibiting local governments from implementing voter identification requirements at polling places.
The new law directly challenges efforts by some municipalities to enhance election security measures, ZeroHedge reported.
The legislation, spearheaded by Democratic Senator Dave Min of Orange County, specifically targets a voter-approved measure in Huntington Beach that mandated photo identification at polling locations.
This legislative action marks the latest development in an ongoing conflict between state Democratic leadership and conservative local governments over election administration.
Huntington Beach, known for its Republican leadership and frequent clashes with Sacramento Democrats, had asserted its authority as a charter city to establish local election protocols.
However, this claim faced immediate opposition from state officials.
Politico reported that California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber took legal action against the city in April, seeking to invalidate their voter ID requirement.
“The right to freely cast your vote is the foundation of our democracy and Huntington Beach’s voter ID policy flies in the face of this principle,” Attorney General Bonta stated when announcing the lawsuit.
ZeroHedge highlighted that California remains one of only 14 states that do not mandate voter identification at polling places, despite requiring identification for various other activities such as driving, air travel and apartment rentals.
The new law is part of a broader legislative agenda by Democratic lawmakers to standardize election practices across the state.
Another bill, signed by Governor Newsom and authored by Senator Steve Bradford, enhances the secretary of state’s oversight of election systems and establishes clearer guidelines for election data management.
These legislative changes appear aimed at preventing conservative jurisdictions like Huntington Beach and Shasta County from implementing election policies often motivated by concerns about voter fraud.
The new law directly challenges efforts by some municipalities to enhance election security measures, ZeroHedge reported.
The legislation, spearheaded by Democratic Senator Dave Min of Orange County, specifically targets a voter-approved measure in Huntington Beach that mandated photo identification at polling locations.
This legislative action marks the latest development in an ongoing conflict between state Democratic leadership and conservative local governments over election administration.
Huntington Beach, known for its Republican leadership and frequent clashes with Sacramento Democrats, had asserted its authority as a charter city to establish local election protocols.
However, this claim faced immediate opposition from state officials.
Politico reported that California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber took legal action against the city in April, seeking to invalidate their voter ID requirement.
“The right to freely cast your vote is the foundation of our democracy and Huntington Beach’s voter ID policy flies in the face of this principle,” Attorney General Bonta stated when announcing the lawsuit.
ZeroHedge highlighted that California remains one of only 14 states that do not mandate voter identification at polling places, despite requiring identification for various other activities such as driving, air travel and apartment rentals.
The new law is part of a broader legislative agenda by Democratic lawmakers to standardize election practices across the state.
Another bill, signed by Governor Newsom and authored by Senator Steve Bradford, enhances the secretary of state’s oversight of election systems and establishes clearer guidelines for election data management.
These legislative changes appear aimed at preventing conservative jurisdictions like Huntington Beach and Shasta County from implementing election policies often motivated by concerns about voter fraud.
70-79, M
