Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why Was It A Better Idea To Stick With Kamala Instead Of Someone Else?

I'm recalling the main argument for Kamala- the worst rated VP in American history, was because she could access Joe Biden's campaign funds.

Kamala is losing.

In hindsight, was it really better to stick with that pile of cash that only Kamala could access, or would it of been wiser to go with a new face, someone uncorruptible and likeable, someone good at their job, and start campaigning for donations from scratch?
joe438 · 61-69, M Best Comment
Who would the Democrats have tapped? They group have needed someone likeable, close to the center fiscally, pro America and against war. No one comes to mind.

4meAndyou · F
Someone good at their job????🤣🤣🤣 Someone likeable???? 🤣🤣🤣 Someone INCORRUPTABLE???? 😳😳😳 Someone chosen LEGALLY through the PRIMARY process?????🤣🤣🤣

The so-called "Democrat" party is actually the Democrat/Socialist/Marxist/Communist party. There IS NO SUCH CANDIDATE who belongs to their party.
Snuffy1957 · 61-69, M
Trump for President 2024 !
SW-User
RockerDad · M
Every poll shows her either ahead or neck and neck with Trump in all of the battleground states. Not sure how you see that as losing.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
A recent ranking of the last 18 vice presidents by historians has Harris squarely in the middle third. And almost all recent national polls have her ahead of the convicted felon Trump.

latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-07-07/vice-president-trump-biden-running-mate-election-2024
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment