This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
LeopoldBloom · M
Republicans are big on “states’ rights” unless a state is doing something they don’t like.
BigGuy2 · 31-35, M
@LeopoldBloom
🤔 ... akin to you nutjobs that seek to destroy peoples lives via Cancel Culture if they are doing something YOU nutjobs don't like
🤔 ... akin to you nutjobs that seek to destroy peoples lives via Cancel Culture if they are doing something YOU nutjobs don't like
BigGuy2 · 31-35, M
@Pikachu ...the 'Elites' see YOU, me and BILLIONS of other people as 'Useless Eaters' ... they see HUMANS as the problem:
"There are too many people in the World" they exclaim, "so how de we stop them from breeding ... let's set in motion a pro-Abortion program"
🤔 ... are you waking up yet 🥱🥱🥱
"There are too many people in the World" they exclaim, "so how de we stop them from breeding ... let's set in motion a pro-Abortion program"
🤔 ... are you waking up yet 🥱🥱🥱
@BigGuy2
Seems to me if you're worried about the "Elites" controlling you, you should want enshrined as robustly as possible certain basic rights like bodily autonomy.
Please answer me directly this time: Why is it a good thing for it to be decided state by state whether or not a woman has the right over her own body?
What other human rights would you like to see taken away and left up to politics?
Seems to me if you're worried about the "Elites" controlling you, you should want enshrined as robustly as possible certain basic rights like bodily autonomy.
Please answer me directly this time: Why is it a good thing for it to be decided state by state whether or not a woman has the right over her own body?
What other human rights would you like to see taken away and left up to politics?
LeopoldBloom · M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BigGuy2 · 31-35, M
@LeopoldBloom ... Cancel Culture is a LibTURD concept, now that we're doing the same thing to you's nutjobs, you're spitting your dummies out like little babies whilst claiming it's a Conservative concept
LeopoldBloom · M
@BigGuy2 "Pro-life" is pro-slavery. You want to force women to give birth at gunpoint.
"Cancel culture" to you is when someone disagrees with a conservative. Stop being such a snowflake.
"Cancel culture" to you is when someone disagrees with a conservative. Stop being such a snowflake.
BigGuy2 · 31-35, M
@LeopoldBloom ... when will you's nutjobs take ownership for something that YOU created, it was LibTURDs that created 'Cancel Culture' ... i can only assume that now normal people are turning the tables on LibTURDs like yourself and doing the same to you's that you're twisting it as if we're to blame for setting it in motion, so that makes YOU the snowflake, not me
As for 'Pro-life' is 'Pro-slavery' - what Planet are you on exactly
... what is the LibTURD obsession with boiling EVERYTHING down to slavery and racism:
LibTURDs/Democrats caused the death of MILLIONS of Americans by starting the Civil War over their opposition in emancipating slaves ...
Then LibTURD's/Democrats were the KKK
As for 'Pro-life' is 'Pro-slavery' - what Planet are you on exactly
... what is the LibTURD obsession with boiling EVERYTHING down to slavery and racism:
LibTURDs/Democrats caused the death of MILLIONS of Americans by starting the Civil War over their opposition in emancipating slaves ...
Then LibTURD's/Democrats were the KKK
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BigGuy2 · 31-35, M
@Pikachu 🤪🤪🤪 ... gladly
Why is it a good thing for it to be decided state by state whether or not a woman has the right over her own body?
... because we STILL have FREE CHOICE
{for example, if she's pregnant after being raped} ... so then, if she's in a State where she's not allowed to terminate it, she can move to a State where she is allowed
Democrats stance is that ALL States should decide, so going forward, it'll be a case of:
"There are too many white people, so you need to abort yours"
😎😎😎
What other human rights would you like to see taken away and left up to politics?
Full Human Rights are sacrosanct
Is that DIRECT enough for you
... here's 3 more 🤪🤪🤪
{Democrats are trying to take away the 1st Amendment Right due to 'misinformation' concerns, but they DON'T and will NEVER explain WHO decides whether it's 'misinformation' ... an example i've already given elsewhere is:
Cackling Hyena:
"There is no problem at the border"
Everybody else on the planet:
"YES, there is, as it's estimated 1.7 MILLION unknowns have entered the Country in the last year ALONE"
Under this new type of Legislation, the Cackling Hyena, can by LAW, shut down that dissent under 'misinformation'
🤔 ... now i know you haven't got the intelligence to extrapolate my examples onto your examples and make inferences, but try anyway ...}
🤔 ... FOOL
DOUBLE STANDARDS in full flow:
... is that DIRECT enough
🤔 ... FOOL 😎😎😎
... once your MELTDOWN subsides, i'll expand further ...
... is that DIRECT enough 🤪🤪🤪
Why is it a good thing for it to be decided state by state whether or not a woman has the right over her own body?
... because we STILL have FREE CHOICE
{for example, if she's pregnant after being raped} ... so then, if she's in a State where she's not allowed to terminate it, she can move to a State where she is allowed
Democrats stance is that ALL States should decide, so going forward, it'll be a case of:
"There are too many white people, so you need to abort yours"
😎😎😎
What other human rights would you like to see taken away and left up to politics?
Full Human Rights are sacrosanct
Is that DIRECT enough for you
... here's 3 more 🤪🤪🤪
{Democrats are trying to take away the 1st Amendment Right due to 'misinformation' concerns, but they DON'T and will NEVER explain WHO decides whether it's 'misinformation' ... an example i've already given elsewhere is:
Cackling Hyena:
"There is no problem at the border"
Everybody else on the planet:
"YES, there is, as it's estimated 1.7 MILLION unknowns have entered the Country in the last year ALONE"
Under this new type of Legislation, the Cackling Hyena, can by LAW, shut down that dissent under 'misinformation'
🤔 ... now i know you haven't got the intelligence to extrapolate my examples onto your examples and make inferences, but try anyway ...}
🤔 ... FOOL
DOUBLE STANDARDS in full flow:
... is that DIRECT enough
🤔 ... FOOL 😎😎😎
... once your MELTDOWN subsides, i'll expand further ...
... is that DIRECT enough 🤪🤪🤪
BigGuy2 · 31-35, M
@BigGuy2
lol a bit rich considering the insult-littered, emoji-filled tirade you evidently worked quite hard on...😏
Nevertheless, clearly my prodding has finally goaded you into giving a straight answer to a straight question. Congratulations!
Now we can discuss.
Why should it be free choice for people to decide whether another person has a right over their own body?
Would you support that same decision for making vaccination the law and refusal to vaccinate punishable by imprisonment?
Or do you recognize the importance of bodily autonomy as a fundamental human right in that context?
lol well no dear, it wasn't. But perhaps we can tease out a direct answer here.
First, define "full human right".
Second, explain why (in what i assumed is a very well-considered opinion) should bodily autonomy NOT be considered a "full human right"?
Surely there are very few rights more fundamental than that of being able to make decisions about your own body and healthcare.
Now i know you're just getting all hot under the collar and ready to start rage typing again...but take a few deep breaths and engage thoughtfully.
do your best 🤗👍
once your MELTDOWN subsides,
lol a bit rich considering the insult-littered, emoji-filled tirade you evidently worked quite hard on...😏
Nevertheless, clearly my prodding has finally goaded you into giving a straight answer to a straight question. Congratulations!
Now we can discuss.
because we STILL have FREE CHOICE
Why should it be free choice for people to decide whether another person has a right over their own body?
Would you support that same decision for making vaccination the law and refusal to vaccinate punishable by imprisonment?
Or do you recognize the importance of bodily autonomy as a fundamental human right in that context?
Full Human Rights are sacrosanct
Is that DIRECT enough for you
Is that DIRECT enough for you
lol well no dear, it wasn't. But perhaps we can tease out a direct answer here.
First, define "full human right".
Second, explain why (in what i assumed is a very well-considered opinion) should bodily autonomy NOT be considered a "full human right"?
Surely there are very few rights more fundamental than that of being able to make decisions about your own body and healthcare.
Now i know you're just getting all hot under the collar and ready to start rage typing again...but take a few deep breaths and engage thoughtfully.
do your best 🤗👍
BigGuy2 · 31-35, M
@Pikachu GLADLY ... 😎😎😎
NOPE ... 🙄🙄🙄 i'm not get'n hot under the collar at all, never have done never will ... the simple fact that you've made that comment at all shows your true colours and it shows my technique is working in that me simply answering your points you deem as 'hot under the collar' ... at least you haven't done the usual ... YET {in that you state "you've rage quit"} which you nutjobs love trying to do 🤪🤪🤪
I work on the assumption that the person - or opposing person - i'm talking to, is an idiot - probably not a good stance to take, but i'm working from my own experiences in debates 🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂ - and you HAVEN'T proven me wrong have you ... and it's worked for me EVERYTIME, i haven't be proven wrong
... as part of that assumption, i aim my comments at the lowest possible level of understanding so that even an idiot can understand, that's why i say YOU haven't proven me wrong ...
... so i'll try and make it even more simpler, shall i 🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂
I won't be bothering defining 'Full Human Rights' as thinking about it now, it's not really relevant to the topic under discussion, ... besides, i'm guessing you're using the technique that you people always accuse of us of doing, which is 'deflection' 😎😎😎
Now are you sitting comfortably in your basement, if so, i'll continue:
Why should it be free choice for people to decide whether another person has a right over their own body?
I've ALREADY given you EXAMPLES as to why a person may want to abort, so i won't be bothering trying again, because you're going to do the same, which is either ignore it, or not read it ...
... but to clarify, at what point have i stated the above {whether another person} - i haven't have, what i HAVE stated in relation to the premise of your post is that Trump is being guided by the Electorat in that some people may agree as to certain conditions where abortion may be deemed as acceptable, so he's being a true leader in doing what the Electorat want
... i have given you examples where polls show that Democrats {which YOU are part of,} have stated that 96% of them agree with LEGAL ABORTION
...whereas the highest that Republicans agree, is 76%
YOU are Pro-Abortion
There will always be some rationale to justify allowing a woman to abort, i'm guessing that's why Trump has made the stance he has made
🤔 ...you have placed the word, or term, 'MAGA' in your post, so that shows that your post has got NOTHING at all to do with a moral standpoint on Legal Abortion and EVERYTHING {100% ... 🤔 or should that be 96% 🤪🤪🤪} to do with Trump bashing ONLY
... so you are towing the party line and doing EXACTLY what you get TOLD to do, which is:
"We are doing {96%} exactly what we criticise 'them' of doing {76%}, but don't you dare criticise 'us' for doing the same"
{There are no posts on your profile criticising Democrats is there 🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂}
So DOUBLE STANDARDS in full flow
{I've looked at all your posts AND forums that you've added yourself to on SW ... there is NOTHING that shows your viewpoint on the morality of Legal Abortion ... AND don't bother adding to a forum or creating a post about the morality of Legal Abortion after you read my reply in an attempt to prove me wrong: date being 09/10/2024}
🤔 ... is that DIRECT enough for you 😎😎😎
🤔 ... you'll be so predictable, so i'll tell you now, i won't bother doing a 3rd attempt, as i believe that my explaination is EXTREMELY SIMPLE ... like you are, 100% {🤔 or should that be 96%} ... 😎😎😎
I don't think i've done enough emoji's ...
... so here's 3 more 🤪🤪🤪
The REAL over-riding issue here is, Democrats want to get rid of as many 'useless eaters' as possible ... hence Pro-Abortion under the guise of 'Pro-Choice'
One of the actual talking points now - Democrat talking points - or more precisely, Liberal talking points ... it that it's HUMANS that are causing 'climate change' ... and it's the stance of:
"Let's get rid of HUMANS" ... there was countless people stating, in the Covid' years:
"There are too many people in the World"
Then lo and behold, what's happening NOW - Pro-Abortion is EVERYWHERE ...
🤔 ... i won't say {again}:
"are you waking up yet ... to what's going on"... because you're not asleep, you're BRAINWASHED
🤔 ... and some more 🤪🤪🤪
NOPE ... 🙄🙄🙄 i'm not get'n hot under the collar at all, never have done never will ... the simple fact that you've made that comment at all shows your true colours and it shows my technique is working in that me simply answering your points you deem as 'hot under the collar' ... at least you haven't done the usual ... YET {in that you state "you've rage quit"} which you nutjobs love trying to do 🤪🤪🤪
I work on the assumption that the person - or opposing person - i'm talking to, is an idiot - probably not a good stance to take, but i'm working from my own experiences in debates 🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂ - and you HAVEN'T proven me wrong have you ... and it's worked for me EVERYTIME, i haven't be proven wrong
... as part of that assumption, i aim my comments at the lowest possible level of understanding so that even an idiot can understand, that's why i say YOU haven't proven me wrong ...
... so i'll try and make it even more simpler, shall i 🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂
I won't be bothering defining 'Full Human Rights' as thinking about it now, it's not really relevant to the topic under discussion, ... besides, i'm guessing you're using the technique that you people always accuse of us of doing, which is 'deflection' 😎😎😎
Now are you sitting comfortably in your basement, if so, i'll continue:
Why should it be free choice for people to decide whether another person has a right over their own body?
I've ALREADY given you EXAMPLES as to why a person may want to abort, so i won't be bothering trying again, because you're going to do the same, which is either ignore it, or not read it ...
... but to clarify, at what point have i stated the above {whether another person} - i haven't have, what i HAVE stated in relation to the premise of your post is that Trump is being guided by the Electorat in that some people may agree as to certain conditions where abortion may be deemed as acceptable, so he's being a true leader in doing what the Electorat want
... i have given you examples where polls show that Democrats {which YOU are part of,} have stated that 96% of them agree with LEGAL ABORTION
...whereas the highest that Republicans agree, is 76%
YOU are Pro-Abortion
There will always be some rationale to justify allowing a woman to abort, i'm guessing that's why Trump has made the stance he has made
🤔 ...you have placed the word, or term, 'MAGA' in your post, so that shows that your post has got NOTHING at all to do with a moral standpoint on Legal Abortion and EVERYTHING {100% ... 🤔 or should that be 96% 🤪🤪🤪} to do with Trump bashing ONLY
... so you are towing the party line and doing EXACTLY what you get TOLD to do, which is:
"We are doing {96%} exactly what we criticise 'them' of doing {76%}, but don't you dare criticise 'us' for doing the same"
{There are no posts on your profile criticising Democrats is there 🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂🤷🏼♂}
So DOUBLE STANDARDS in full flow
{I've looked at all your posts AND forums that you've added yourself to on SW ... there is NOTHING that shows your viewpoint on the morality of Legal Abortion ... AND don't bother adding to a forum or creating a post about the morality of Legal Abortion after you read my reply in an attempt to prove me wrong: date being 09/10/2024}
🤔 ... is that DIRECT enough for you 😎😎😎
🤔 ... you'll be so predictable, so i'll tell you now, i won't bother doing a 3rd attempt, as i believe that my explaination is EXTREMELY SIMPLE ... like you are, 100% {🤔 or should that be 96%} ... 😎😎😎
I don't think i've done enough emoji's ...
... so here's 3 more 🤪🤪🤪
The REAL over-riding issue here is, Democrats want to get rid of as many 'useless eaters' as possible ... hence Pro-Abortion under the guise of 'Pro-Choice'
One of the actual talking points now - Democrat talking points - or more precisely, Liberal talking points ... it that it's HUMANS that are causing 'climate change' ... and it's the stance of:
"Let's get rid of HUMANS" ... there was countless people stating, in the Covid' years:
"There are too many people in the World"
Then lo and behold, what's happening NOW - Pro-Abortion is EVERYWHERE ...
🤔 ... i won't say {again}:
"are you waking up yet ... to what's going on"... because you're not asleep, you're BRAINWASHED
🤔 ... and some more 🤪🤪🤪
LeopoldBloom · M
@BigGuy2 Yes, forcing women to gestate against their will is slavery. Slavery may be defined as forcing someone to use their body unwillingly in the service of another person. Forced gestation is no different than forcing someone to pick cotton against their will.
The 13th Amendment forbids slavery and involuntary servitude. Forced gestation should fall under this.
The 13th Amendment forbids slavery and involuntary servitude. Forced gestation should fall under this.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BigGuy2 · 31-35, M
LeopoldBloom · M
@BigGuy2 Thank you for your studied response, Professor. Let me know when you manage to walk around a tree without getting lost.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment