Does Trump think that 9/11 was an "inside job"?

Another post made me look up "Laura Loomer", and then made me question whether Trump himself is a 9/11 conspiracy pusher. He has made suggestions in the past - but he frequently talks out of his ass.

If it was an "inside job", as claimed by many of his supporters including some here, why didn't Trump expose that during his 4 years as president?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F

According to you kkkdems there is no such thing as a conspiracy, and you make fun of anyone who dares to question your authority in all things. I guess you think Osama didn’t conspire to have the attack in New York. Maybe you think Hitler didn’t conspire to go to war with the world. Recent theories of conspiracy might include the 2020. election. I feel sure the nine thousand dead people who voted didn’t conspire among themselves. Those people caught going from county to county voting were not conspiring among themselves or with kkkdems themselves. I bet those vote counters who stayed late and drug out suitcases stuffed with fraudulent ballots surly didn’t conspire to get them, we don’t know why the cameras showed what they did. Or the people who moved to other states and voted in the new state AND the old state. What about the dem pole workers in Detroit? Of course they just ran off the republicans for fun. Or the machines made in Venezuela that switched DT votes to bidumb votes in 500 vote batches. Or, how did the over 60 courts the DT campaign attempted to get heard in happen to be kkkdems? They refused to hear any of the cases so the election was NRVER adjudicated in court. All of these things were just coincidence, even all of the judges happened to be kkkdems in those particular districts. No questions here😊

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@MarthannBann888 Reading your drivel - I am confused. Are you saying that Trump thinks 9/11 was an "inside job"?

MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F

@trollslayer

I am sorry troll, I wasn’t talking down as much as I usually do. I thought you would get it. In plainer speak. Most educated people have known since the beginning of recorded history that people have conspired against one another. It wasn’t until Hillary Clinton spoke of a “great right wing conspiracy” on a second grade talk show in answer to a question about the many murdered people surrounding their political life.
In this case, I was giving the reader a sample of historical incidents that conservatives have been ridiculed about their questions concerning possible conspiracies. When intelligent and educated people look at these incidents the first thing that comes to mind is the near impossibility of these events to have occurred without prior planning.
In this case troll was making the case in a lose manner that the election and 9/11 were not conspiracies even though he suspected Trump did stupidly think they were conspiracies.
I was merely pointing out that there were some events that were hard to explain without some preplanning being done.

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@MarthannBann888 What is your definition of "conspiracy?" I was using the term to mean "conspiracy theory": https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy%20theory

My question is whether Trump believes the commonly held explanation for 9/11 that a group of terrorists led by Osama Bin Laden hijacked and crashed commercial planes into things, or is he one to believe that others inside the USA were involved in assisting that event for sinister purposes.

All the other drivel you posted has ZERO evidence to back it up.

MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F

@trollslayer

Clearly, you are addicted to “links”. I saw/read some of my information first hand. In others I reference the original books. Computer links do not actually constitute a reference in the way you think they do. You must be getting your information from bloom who uses those links. I use first hand observation, peer reviewed studies, and government or polling sources. Most things that are published are not sources. Psychology Today, for example, is not considered up to the quality of a reference. This means the links you all put up are not as good as link sausage sold in grocery stores. So, although I don’t try to put you down and say much, many times your sources are worthless. With that being said, your shit is as much drivel as you think mine is. You are one of those closed minded people who think anything you disagree with is drivel. A new thought must be terrifying. If you had your way you would eliminate everyone who disagrees with you. Hence, canceling is the best you can do right now.

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@MarthannBann888 so still no evidence to back it up. I was hoping for intelligent conversation. Welcome to my ban list.

Ps - walmart is selling the big rolls of tin fool cheap this week. Suggest you stock up. Maybe put a bag over your head to keep from breathing the chemicals they spray from planes.

MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F

@trollslayer

Maybe you would like to say exactly what you would like me to document. I will do so, but will not use good for nothing links. Clearly you have never taken a course telling you how you have to reference your dissertation. If you would take one you would see what I mean. Otherwise I will be happy to continue to be on your cancel list.
By the way, it is a hallmark of the ignorant and uneducated that they are very adverse to information that does not agree with their view. So I fully expect a contemptuous reply based on your fabricated view of me.
As to Trump, I don’t know or care what DT believes about 911.
A better question is do YOU believe that the numerous mistakes made in Butler, PA by the CIA were accidents. Or do you believe that a fuck up that colossal just might be intentional? In other words, are your dem leaders murderers. Of course, you will have to go outside of the steel fortress you call a mind and look for both sides as told by themselves. Dan Bongino was CIA and he is thorough and convincing.
It is a sign of the shallow nature of liberal thought that their attention is on 911 when the nature of current events is so serious.