Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Does Trump think that 9/11 was an "inside job"?

Another post made me look up "Laura Loomer", and then made me question whether Trump himself is a 9/11 conspiracy pusher. He has made suggestions in the past - but he frequently talks out of his ass.

If it was an "inside job", as claimed by many of his supporters including some here, why didn't Trump expose that during his 4 years as president?
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
According to you kkkdems there is no such thing as a conspiracy, and you make fun of anyone who dares to question your authority in all things. I guess you think Osama didn’t conspire to have the attack in New York. Maybe you think Hitler didn’t conspire to go to war with the world. Recent theories of conspiracy might include the 2020. election. I feel sure the nine thousand dead people who voted didn’t conspire among themselves. Those people caught going from county to county voting were not conspiring among themselves or with kkkdems themselves. I bet those vote counters who stayed late and drug out suitcases stuffed with fraudulent ballots surly didn’t conspire to get them, we don’t know why the cameras showed what they did. Or the people who moved to other states and voted in the new state AND the old state. What about the dem pole workers in Detroit? Of course they just ran off the republicans for fun. Or the machines made in Venezuela that switched DT votes to bidumb votes in 500 vote batches. Or, how did the over 60 courts the DT campaign attempted to get heard in happen to be kkkdems? They refused to hear any of the cases so the election was NRVER adjudicated in court. All of these things were just coincidence, even all of the judges happened to be kkkdems in those particular districts. No questions here😊
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@trollslayer

Clearly, you are addicted to “links”. I saw/read some of my information first hand. In others I reference the original books. Computer links do not actually constitute a reference in the way you think they do. You must be getting your information from bloom who uses those links. I use first hand observation, peer reviewed studies, and government or polling sources. Most things that are published are not sources. Psychology Today, for example, is not considered up to the quality of a reference. This means the links you all put up are not as good as link sausage sold in grocery stores. So, although I don’t try to put you down and say much, many times your sources are worthless. With that being said, your shit is as much drivel as you think mine is. You are one of those closed minded people who think anything you disagree with is drivel. A new thought must be terrifying. If you had your way you would eliminate everyone who disagrees with you. Hence, canceling is the best you can do right now.
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@MarthannBann888 so still no evidence to back it up. I was hoping for intelligent conversation. Welcome to my ban list.

Ps - walmart is selling the big rolls of tin fool cheap this week. Suggest you stock up. Maybe put a bag over your head to keep from breathing the chemicals they spray from planes.
MarthannBann888 · 70-79, F
@trollslayer

Maybe you would like to say exactly what you would like me to document. I will do so, but will not use good for nothing links. Clearly you have never taken a course telling you how you have to reference your dissertation. If you would take one you would see what I mean. Otherwise I will be happy to continue to be on your cancel list.
By the way, it is a hallmark of the ignorant and uneducated that they are very adverse to information that does not agree with their view. So I fully expect a contemptuous reply based on your fabricated view of me.
As to Trump, I don’t know or care what DT believes about 911.
A better question is do YOU believe that the numerous mistakes made in Butler, PA by the CIA were accidents. Or do you believe that a fuck up that colossal just might be intentional? In other words, are your dem leaders murderers. Of course, you will have to go outside of the steel fortress you call a mind and look for both sides as told by themselves. Dan Bongino was CIA and he is thorough and convincing.
It is a sign of the shallow nature of liberal thought that their attention is on 911 when the nature of current events is so serious.
DomMan67 · 56-60, M
All I can say is that we are all a representation of who we surround ourself with.

We may not have choices in the outcome of specific things that are important to us but we certainly have choices in who we allow to be in our Inner Circle.

It is highly unlikely we would invite somebody to our dinner table that we had vehemently opposing views with especially repeatedly.

It is even more absurd that we would allow that individual into our Inner Circle so we could constantly have contradictory views and arguments.

So I think that speaks for itself.

Warren Buffett has some quotes about that and it is essentially that your top five friends are who you are in aggregate.

There's a target audience for things like Trump spews and that is people that are willing to believe that anything is possible even without evidence because once that becomes a reality to them there is no limit to how far you can push the extreme.

You don't need evidence you just have to say it and that's a big problem for those of us that have contrary views where if you're going to make claims you need to have evidence to support them.

And to be clear evidence to support them doesn't mean you just get to say it cuz we have free speech in the US. Evidence to support them means you need to prove it where there are consequences for lying such as a court of law.

Now that all by itself will blow the minds of some people because they have no idea what was actually filed in court. We have instances where Trump attorneys will go on TV and spew complete utter bullshit and their court filings will say the opposite of what they said on TV.

There is a reason why Trump loses nearly all of his court cases but again that would require a level of effort to understand beyond what people see on TV.

And that shows how gullible we are and how powerful media is.

 
Post Comment