@BohemianBabe Where do I even begin? And no, in spite of what left-wing extremists like you may believe, people who simply disagree with you are not by default "Nazis". And a belief, opinion or fact isn't a "conspiracy theory" simply because you don't like it.
Maybe you're not a Nazi, but you have fallen for conspiracy theories that come from Nazism, such as the Great Replacement. So I'm sure you think Harris and Walz are Marxist Jews or something.
"The Great Replacement (French: grand remplacement), also known as replacement theory or great replacement theory,[1][2][3] is a white nationalist[4] far-right conspiracy theory[3][5][6][7] espoused by French author Renaud Camus. The original theory states that, with the complicity or cooperation of "replacist" elites,[a][5][8] the ethnic French and white European populations at large are being demographically and culturally replaced by non-white peoples—especially from Muslim-majority countries—through mass migration, demographic growth and a drop in the birth rate of white Europeans.[5][9][10]"
@Bel6EQUJ5 I know, the Right doesn't like Wikipedia because it requires legit sources.
You can say they're buzzwords, but what it's saying is true. You believe in a conspiracy theory in which shadowy forces are trying to fill the white countries with non-white immigrants. This theory was expanded on and heavily promoted by the original Nazis, now it's common among Neo-Nazis.
I know, the Right doesn't like Wikipedia because it requires legit sources.
Have you ever thought of becoming a comedian? Wikipedia isn't a legitimate source simply because anyone who knows how can write whatever nonsense on it they want. "Legit sources"? Since when? And what counts as "legit" according to those who run the website?
@Bel6EQUJ5 No, you're required to source the claims you make on Wikipedia. Which is more than I can say for right-wing media, where people can make up anything without any evidence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement
Notice how the editors are required to link to peer-reviewed sources that explain how this is a racist conspiracy theory promoted by the Nazis.
@Bel6EQUJ5 BooBoo's not very smart. I think he needs to get out of his parents' basement and experience the real world. He really should also get a job.
No, you're required to source the claims you make on Wikipedia.
And what if those sources are unreliable? Does anyone there bother to check, or are they just happy that someone has made a contribution, because contributions equal dollars?
@BohemianBabe Well, in places like Canada and California (you know, those socialist utopia hellholes) you can't even grasp at straws, because they've banned them.
@Bel6EQUJ5 No, the sources have to be peer-reviewed. Wikipedia is a lot like aggregate data.
And by the way, anyone can write a book. Just because something is in a book, doesn't mean it's reliable information. Wikipedia is generally more reliable because it's constantly being worked on by people within the fields that the pages address.
You can also look up the propaganda that the Nazis used yourself. I've read Mein Kampf, Hitler talks about the Great Replacement. Goebbels often referenced it in his speeches. Same goes for the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, which they called "Cultural Bolshevism."
@JohnOlinger81 Why do you keep asking me that? No, I don't like politicians, although Tulsi Gabbard is of course HOT. Now I'll ask you. Which politician do YOU find hot?
