Exciting
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Trump has brought in Tulsi Gabbard

To help him with debate prep. This is great strategy in my opinion. Tulsi destroyed Kamala when she debated her. Sounds to me Trump is taking the debate seriously and will be ready to mop the floor of cackling hyena Kamala I can’t wait!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
She did bet Harris in a debate but that was a short thing four and half years ago. She did it by grilling her on foreign policy (Gabbard is anti-war).

Given that Trump is keen to end the war in Ukraine ASAP, the Democrats will see that coming a mile away and be prepared for it.

The big flaw in this strategy is that Trump can't debate like Tulsi Gabbard, he can only debate like Donald Trump. His style is all about bluster and has nothing to do with precision (which is how Gabbard nailed Harris).

I think that Kamala Harris has very average debate skills for an elite politician but she doesn't need to be brilliant, just coherent and on-message. Trump was brutal as an ultra-aggressive debater in 2016 but he's lost an edge since then. He's not as quick-witted and moderators these days don't let him 'dominate' by interrupting.
Northwest · M
@Burnley123

She did bet Harris in a debate but that was a short thing four and half years ago. She did it by grilling her on foreign policy (Gabbard is anti-war).

It was about her record as California's Attorney General, specifically that she declined to pass on prosecuting marijuana related offenses, and not interfering in a death-row case. Harris dismissed her, and during an interview later, she explained that she was not going to waste her time responding to Gabbard's comment.

So, she was enforcing the law, something Trump is going to have a hard time attack.

Just for the records. Gabbars is not anti-war. She has been in the employ of Putin's intelligence services, even when she was in Congress.

She took an all expense paid trip to Syria and the Middle East, to defend the Assad regime, on behalf of Putin. The cover was a Lebanese-American businessman, who invited her.

After Congress, she took a job as an announcer for RT, and when RT was banned in the US, she took a job at Fox News.

But I guess you can say that she's anti war against Putin and the international wars Putin does not support.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Northwest Hey, I'm not a fan of Gabbard. Whatever Berniecrat cred she once had is long buried.
@Burnley123 I think Gabbard is helping him prep by playing Harris, like how Chris Christie helped Biden prep by playing Trump. It’s not like she’s advising him, or that he could even absorb any advice.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
Northwest · M
@Burnley123 She's been an imposter from day 1, and an antisemite to boot and I don't use this accusation lightly. I don't think she was ever a real Bernicrat. I'm really hoping Trump is taking advice from him, but his people want her, because of a single sound bite, but Harris learned the lesson: don't refuse to answer your opponent, because she's really beneath you.
@Northwest Keep in mind, Gabbard was raised in an isolated, hysterically homophobic cult that broke off from the Hare Krishnas (the Science of Identity Foundation). It's unclear if she's still under the control of the cult's leader, Chris Butler. Gabbard claims to be a Hindu today, not entirely false as Hare Krishna is itself an offshoot of Hinduism (although other Hindus don't consider it legitimate, similar to how many Christians don't consider the Jehovah's Witnesses to be legitimate Christianity). Hare Krishna was started by Srila Prabhupada, an Indian pharmacist who emigrated to the US and found followers among the hippies in the 1960s. His translation of the Bhagavad-Gita is considered the worst English version available, which is unfortunate as this is the copy Americans will tend to have, as the Hare Krishnas distribute them for free.

I never heard of SIF until Gabbard came onto the scene, as it's limited to Hawaii, but I know quite a bit about the Hare Krishnas as I encountered them frequently in the 1980s when I was in college. They have (or had) a vegetarian restaurant in LA which was supposed to be quite good.

As far as I can tell, most of Gabbard's support comes from white, conservative middle-aged men who like her because she looks good in a bathing suit and couldn't care less about the above.
Northwest · M
@LeopoldBloom This is from a WaPo 2019, post Democrat candidates debate:

That bias, combined with her long record of defending the Assad regime and parroting its propaganda, form the basis for the assertion Gabbard has “embraced and been an apologist for” Assad, as Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.) said Wednesday post-debate on CNN. Harris also said she doesn’t take Gabbard seriously.

But Gabbard’s candidacy should be taken very seriously — not because she has a significant chance of being president, but because her narrative on Syria is deeply incorrect, immoral and un-American. If it were adopted by her party and the country, it would lead the United States down a perilous moral and strategic path.

I remember the Hare Krishnas from back in the 1980s, when they were allowed to run around airports handing out books.