Why do people refer to far-left, violent extremists as 'Liberals'?

They're not 'liberal' at all. They're authoritarians, Marxists, communists who want nothing else but power. They're deviants, freaks, feral automatons who subsist on a diet of constant media propaganda, and who will at the turn of a switch transfer their loyalty (from Biden to Harris, for example). This is what they are:

[image/video deleted]

As far as I'm concerned, they're demons in disguise, wreaking havoc for the sole purpose of causing chaos and confusion. They don't actually care about any of the issues they pretend to care about, but love to virtue signal as a way to present themselves as being the 'Good Guys'.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M

Well first off the "left " in the US are liberals. There are basically no such thing as leftists with any power in the west and hasn't been since the 1940s.

I mean you are right liberals and leftists are not the same thing yet somehow you still have no idea what a leftist is.

So you got so close to the point and then tripped over yourself at the end.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M

@Bel6EQUJ5 I am sorry if the truth triggers you. That is a you problem.

Words have definitions. Nothing you have been throwing a tantrum about has anything to do with leftists.

Find me any instance of Biden or Harris talking about the public ownership of the means of production. Good luck with that.

daydeeo · 61-69, M

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow What about "back door socialism"? A phrase that I believe I've just coined.
By that I mean massive government subsidies to selected, government-approved industries. Or, on the ither hand, refusing to lease governoent lands to disfavored industries.

PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M

@daydeeo That is not socialism. At best it is managed capitalism.

Until they talk about seizing corporate assets and handing them over to worker collectives it is not socialism.

daydeeo · 61-69, M

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow "seizing corporate assets and handing them over to worker collectives...." Isn't that communism?

PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M

@daydeeo Nope. That is socialism.

Communism is what socialism is intended to lead to long term.

Communism is basically Star Trek. No scarcity and the concept of money and private ownership is obsolete.

Reason10 · 70-79, M

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Excuse me? Are you high on meth?

Unelected Joe, KKKlinton, Saddam Hussein Obama, KKKarter, ARE ALL LEFT WINGERS. They ALL governed from the extreme LEFT and did untold damage to this country.

PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M

@Reason10 You can't string together a coherent sentence and you claim I am on drugs. Look in the mirror.

Words have definitions. None of those people were left wing. Not even remotely.

But good job proving your claims of an education are lies.

With your ignorance a GED is not even in the cards for you.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment