Why do people refer to far-left, violent extremists as 'Liberals'?

They're not 'liberal' at all. They're authoritarians, Marxists, communists who want nothing else but power. They're deviants, freaks, feral automatons who subsist on a diet of constant media propaganda, and who will at the turn of a switch transfer their loyalty (from Biden to Harris, for example). This is what they are:

[image/video deleted]

As far as I'm concerned, they're demons in disguise, wreaking havoc for the sole purpose of causing chaos and confusion. They don't actually care about any of the issues they pretend to care about, but love to virtue signal as a way to present themselves as being the 'Good Guys'.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

RageAgainstTheMachine · 41-45, M

I suggest you separate religious tropes from political discourse, it weakens your opinion and ultimately the message you are attempting to express.

Bel6EQUJ5

@RageAgainstTheMachine Au contraire, it strengthens it.

RageAgainstTheMachine · 41-45, M

@Bel6EQUJ5 Disagreeing without reason ends the discourse you are seeking, unless of course, you are simply standing on "a soap box."

daydeeo · 61-69, M

@RageAgainstTheMachine Where is there any allusion to religion?

RageAgainstTheMachine · 41-45, M

@daydeeo

they're demons in disguise, wreaking havoc for the sole purpose of causing chaos and confusion

daydeeo · 61-69, M

@RageAgainstTheMachine I didn't take that literally.

RageAgainstTheMachine · 41-45, M

@daydeeo It was not clarified either way, thus why I replied "Disagreeing without reason ends the discourse you are seeking."

Bel6EQUJ5

@RageAgainstTheMachine It can be taken literally or not. It works either way.