This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
If we're taking the meaning as being detained indefinitely without being charged and convicted then I'm against. I would support detaining for a period sufficient to gather evidence or eliminate imminent threats, such as in the case of terror suspects, but the term should be fixed by a judge, any extension should have to be applied for at the end of the fixed period and it should only be granted if significant progress has been made.