THIS is the definition of Climate Change, the SCIENCE.

CLIMATE is defined as prevailing weather conditions in a specific area over a period of time.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/climate
the general weather conditions usually found in a particular place:

CLIMATE CHANGE would be defined as a CHANGE OF PREVAILING WEATHER PATTERNS in a specific area over a period of time.

For that to happen, it would have to SNOW in Key West, Florida, in July. There would have to be a year round monsoon in the Kalihari Region of Africa (a place with ZERO surface water.) There would have to be temperatures of 100 degrees in Alaska in January.

THAT would be climate change.

It is that simple.

If all you have is a bunch of idiotic graphs (written by computer nerds who use flawed computer models and do ZERO field research) you're an idiot.

Bottom line, the GLOBAL CLIMATE is the same as it was in the 1950s. We are kind of fortunate because the Ice Age (which pretty much separated human life from dinosaur life) occurred 11,700 years ago. That was the LAST global event that could have been defined as climate.

If you STILL want to believe in the Nazi politicians who include the CLIMATE CHANGE lie in pretty much every stump speech they make, if you want to pay that addition CARBON TAX on the energy that enables you to survive, if you don't care about being FORCED by government to drive an Electric Car, with a $20,000 battery that WILL explode at some point, causing you and your family to DIE in flames, you are dangerously STUPID.

Thank GOD most of America isn't that stupid.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Northwest · M

Capitalizing words, is no substitute for understanding of climate science, historical data, computer modeling, or how the computer nerds who made the computer, phone, or computing device you're using to copy/paste your message into.

In other words, you're still clueless.

Reason10 · 70-79, M

@Northwest I understand SCIENCE more than you blue state fourth grade dropouts. I understand the definitions of words. Apparently you left wing goose steppers have no problem just making up definitions when you lose an argument.

I presented DICTIONARY definitions of the word Climate. If you have a problem with the dictionary, your beef is with whatever blue state public school teacher socially promoted you through the grades without teaching you anything.

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@Reason10 and how many earth scientists do you personally know?

Northwest · M

@Reason10

I understand SCIENCE more than you blue state fourth grade dropouts. I understand the definitions of words. Apparently you left wing goose steppers have no problem just making up definitions when you lose an argument.

I presented DICTIONARY definitions of the word Climate. If you have a problem with the dictionary, your beef is with whatever blue state public school teacher socially promoted you through the grades without teaching you anything.

I did say you're clueless. This is a statement of fact, not some random thought on my part.

The Cambridge Dictionary link you provided, did not have the word salad you presented. It, however, had the following:

The world's premier climate scientists report that global warming is already occurring.

So, yes, the general weather conditions usually found in a particular place, but we are effecting climate change, due to our behavior.

You should stick with what you know. And what would that be, because it's certainly not climate science, or even looking something up.

trollslayer · 46-50, M

@Northwest well, if he sticks with what he knows, he should just log off.

Reason10 · 70-79, M

@trollslayer How many are on my payroll? That depends on how much the DemoNazis are paying them to come up with the LIES.
I don't recognize someone who calls himself a scientist if he is pushing junk science. There are plenty of those around.

DogMan · 61-69, M

@Northwest As a conservative, I believe the earth is warming slightly. I also believe that
the climate has consistently changed since the beginning of time. It has been much
colder, and much warmer. The one thing that is new, is the amount of video we have
showing deadly systems, also the amount of people affected by weather, since there
are far more people on the planet.

I do not however, believe that the government needs to spend Trillions of dollars
and bankrupt us into what they believe will change the climate. We are already
developing renewables at a high rate, we do not need to be fleeced by the
government. Although, if I were a Democrat politician, I may push for huge
government programs that I could invest in and make a shit load of money.

Northwest · M

@DogMan

As a conservative, I believe the earth is warming slightly.

Is this some sort of new branch of climate science?

I also believe that
the climate has consistently changed since the beginning of time.

I'm floored. Why didn't anyone figure this out? You would think, right?

It has been much
colder, and much warmer.

Again. Wow! I mean wow!

The one thing that is new, is the amount of video we have
showing deadly systems,

Yes, because up until the invention of the 24/7 media cycle, no one ever recorded anything.

also the amount of people affected by weather, since there
are far more people on the planet.

Not sure I follow. Is this purely numerical, or as a percentage of the people alive at the time?

I do not however, believe that the government needs to spend Trillions of dollars
and bankrupt us into what they believe will change the climate. We are already
developing renewables at a high rate, we do not need to be fleeced by the
government. Although, if I were a Democrat politician, I may push for huge
government programs that I could invest in and make a shit load of money.

Why do you think we're evolving renewable energy at t a record pace? Could it be because the government is setting the stage?

You should avoid tripping over your own dick, when making arguments.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment