Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Boy, have I got a conspiracy for you!

Novembers US elections will be the last. (Thats not new) If Trump wins, the takeover of Trump at the head of the Project 2025 team will be swift and efficient, in total contrast to his 2016 victory,which he botched horribly. (This is not new) If he loses he will challenge the result and call out the MAGA morons again and this time those Militia groups will be in place and coordinated ready to occupy and hold strategic offices.. (Thats not new) And the Democrats have assisted behind the scenes, having been funded by the same sources as the right. to put up the weakest possible candidate to oppose the republican candidate, no matter who it is, by propping up Biden and giving the Right as much legitimacy as possible.. But dont panic folks. Trump wont be running anything. That will be Steve Bannon, Steven Miller and the Project 2025 people. Nothing to see here. Move along..
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SandWitch · 26-30, F
Everything you say makes sense in this post, only because none of this could be dreamt up by Trump himself. You understand that Trump is not a political strategist, right?

Who is however, is Steve Bannon. The good thing about Steve Bannon being Donald's inner voice is that Steve has been incarcerated for about a week now and will remain so for at least the next 18 months. Unless Steve left Donald a 'To Do' list before the cops carted Steve away from his home in a van last week, Donald might have to think for himself for a change.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@SandWitch The "to do" list is now called "Project 2025" and it is well under way. Stephen Miller and his close friends are looking after it..😷
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@whowasthatmaskedman
Sounds like the same 'club' that started taking membership in 1933 or thereabouts, as my military history memory serves me! Oh, the suspense is killing me! I wonder what might happen next?!
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@SandWitch In my view, either nothing as America stays divided, or nothing good...😷
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@whowasthatmaskedman
I agree! What you speak about is precisely why the USA is teetering on becoming the country that USE to be the world monetary standard when it came to global trade and commerce. It is for this same reason that I feel the choosing of the US President should be taken out of the hands of the American people who clearly are too inept to think outside the continental box of their own badly ruptured country. Soon, it won't matter a damn what the USA is doing or not doing, as long as they follow along and stay in the que.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@SandWitch I think we have reached common ground here. I have stated previously that the American elections should be taken out of the hands of American voters compteley and some UN based system of representation be managed for Americans, who clearly arent informed or mature enough to vote like adults..Maybe in another century they will be ready..😷
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@whowasthatmaskedman
Well, it's like this... if the USA wants to pretend it's the Leader of the world in so many ways, then why do a bunch of high school educated, unemployed bums get to decide who that world leader will be who will then set the pace for the rest of the world to follow?

I suggest that Americans themselves retain 25% of the vote, while the Leaders of the other UN countries (excluding Russia) make up 75% of the American vote for President. It gives the poor, uneducated Americans a say in the matter, yet at the same time the Presidency itself isn't ambushed by lazy Americans who can't get off their lazy fat asses long enough to get out and vote.

The truth is, you can't trust Americans to vote competently anyway, so it really doesn't matter if 51% of the entire country doesn't bother to vote again this time around or at anytime for that matter. Give them 25% of the vote and then sit back and see who goes out to vote.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@SandWitch Lets be honest here. If you could only change one thing, then making voting compulsory would have to be the one that makes the most difference. Even though people are apathetic, forcing them to vote would get their opinion heard and make a difference, as people would register disapproval..😷
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@whowasthatmaskedman
But you're assuming that Americans take the time to study who they're competently voting for in the first place before making it compulsory for everyone to vote. Making something compulsory doesn't guarantee any different result than leaving things just as they are.

There were a dozen books written on Donald J. Trump dating back to the 1980's which clearly show the man is a narcissistic sociopath, not to forget mentioning being wholly dependent on his father Fred Trump for steady employment for all of Donald's adult life. Despite those books being readily available, Americans still voted for a con man and fraud artist as their President.

So, even if every American went out and voted, do you really think it would make any difference to the outcome we've learned to expect from Americans, if they remain ignorant of who it is they are actually voting for, or not voting for?
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@SandWitch You have a point.. But I did specify making only one change and the one thing you can count on most people to do is vote in their own interest. Take money out of their pocket and see how that works..No matter how uneducated they are, they feel it in the hip pocket. But I did start my saying America really does need to be treated as a Protectorate of the UN for a while. Partly because of the immaturity of the voters. And partly to get the real power out of rifle range. 😷
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@whowasthatmaskedman

Good point, yes you did specify those points mentioned for sure. So then, a Protectorate of the UN would be a state that is controlled and protected by another state. In this case, the USA would be controlled by the UN and protected as well under the collective umbrella of the UN, if I understand you correctly.

Partly because of the immaturity of the voters. And partly to get the real power out of rifle range.

Yes, the immaturity of the American voters must be addressed without question while protecting the family assets from it's own misguided use of itself. Brilliant.