Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I'm really concerned with the division in this country. I know everyone says that, but think about it...

The way left wing peeps talk about conservatives is not any different than how a normal person talks about Nazis. The way conservatives generalize about lefties is no diff than how ppl talk about tankies. I don't say that a civil war is gonna break out or anything overly dramatic like that, but I do think cultural divide is making it harder for society to do anything cohesive.

I'm more right wing, culturally speaking at least. But I am always careful never to act like lefties are bad, or that it takes some particularly deviant mind to be a run of the mill leftist. I don't. I don't even think lefties are nessecarily any worse ppl than cons, like legit. I also recognize that given who I am and my demographic, it's statistically normal for me to believe what I do.

I think most lefties are left wing for this reason: Because they were born in Oregon, or california, or scandanavia.
I think most conservatives are conservative for this reason: Cause they were born in the south, or texas, or from the 50s, or some shit like that.

I think that if we forget that what makes people virtuous is their interpersonal empathy and daily deeds, we can avoid the division. I have way more in common with a left wing person who volunteers are a childrens hospital and and a homeless shelter than I do right wing individual who think charity is stupid because of some stupid Ayn Rand bullshit. I'd hope the lefties feel the same too.

I think it's just outright ignorance to suggest that being right or left is highly influenced by brain chemistry, genetics, or personality. Yes, these things are a factor. I'v been cited studies about the difference in the average lefty brain that righty brain. It's a predictor, but what's far more of a predictor is where you come from.
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
Society does its bit to form one's politics. Once I was a right leaning "moderate.". Serving in the military with most of my time overseas made me into a committed leftist.
@ViciDraco The systematic power definition pretty much started and ended with academics working in social science. It's from sociology books. I put no stock on it cause it's not what anyone who isn't dealing in that field (or a left wing activist) is talking about. Plus,

I don't really agree with you on anything else you say, tho I think you are well meaning. You want a color blind world, and not a LITERAL color blind world (I hate when ppl say that) but one where race becomes a relevant as hair color. I think you mean well. I personally think it's way better for everyone if we stop moral fagging and let people govern themselves locally. Do you personally wanna tell all the cubans to stop caring when non cubans like myself move into their neighborhood? I don't, even tho i'm the one who got mean looks and ignored daily. I think it's way more reasonable to let people who wanna live in a homogenous ethno-state do it, and let people who wanna live in diverse spaces do it to. I support direct democracy on many issues, especially locally one. I think cubans should be allowed to make little havannah a municipality and ethno-state, and white ppl can also do the same, as can black people if they want to.
@ViciDraco And just to clarify, even tho i'm an extremist, I don't wanna live in a white ethno-state. Only time i'd wanna do that is if I have white kids. If I marry a brown girl and have zeebra babies, then I wouldn't want to live in one.
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
@BRUUH one correction: It is not my goal for race to become as relevant as hair color. It is my firm belief, based on genetics, that that is actually a fact and I would like human behavior to begin recognizing it as such.

The thing is, is I don't believe in forcing people to change their behavior overnight. It takes a lot of time and diligence to see that change. The actions I can take today are planting the seeds of trees I certainly won't live long enough to enjoy the shade of.

One of the problems with giving into people's desires to live in ethno-states is it leads to conflict over resources between ethno-states. Trade eventually breaks down between those structures and wars become genocides to remove people from desirable lands.

A secondary problem is that they tend to become more and more narrowly defined. If a white only community formed in the US, how long would it take before Italians are considered no longer white? It's happened in the past. Used to be trouble to be Scottish too.

I definitely agree that racism is not just a white people problem. I just think white people have the power and resources to go first because it's going to take a long time to rebuild lost trust and then even longer to make inroads where xenophobia is prevalent. Trying to force it is only going to reinforce the resistance.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
I believe you need to travel more throughout the states.

You really wouldn't be saying some of the things you have.

I have both traveled through or actually lived in 40 states. There's no east versus west division.

BTW a very vocal liberal user on here lives in the southeast. And I personally know of extreme liberals in Texas. More than a hundred actually. And in Southern California all the following countries are Republican counties:

San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino and Orange county.

In other words most of Southern California are conservatives. And go to Oregon most of the Eastern counties are as well conservatives.

Your demographics are totally off based on both parties.

I will say this on demographics. Most MAJOR cities over a million tend to be liberal. And rural areas tend to be conservative. That's the only thing you can judge by throughout the USA. There are exceptions to that however.
Theyitis · 36-40, M
Actually, unfortunately, conditions are ripe for an insurgency, the modern version of a civil war. I read that experts that study civil wars all over the world have found two factors that are always present: 1. One major political party is based on achieving dominance by a single race/ethnicity (today’s Republicans are working to solidify the white race as dominant over all other races), and 2. Either a democracy that’s sliding back into authoritarianism (that’s us) or an authoritarian state that’s opening up to democracy. Stable authoritarian states like North Korea don’t have civil wars, nor do stable democracies.

And you know that no matter what the outcome there will be about half the country that won’t accept the results of this year’s election. So buckle your seatbelts!
I think most lefties are left wing for this reason: Because they were born in Oregon, or california, or scandanavia.

Not the Scandinavian Countries, it's mostly Americans that get worked up over politics and sadly lots of others are catching the disease.
The left is the answer to the ecocide and the endless wars, as well as the answer to inequality.
Fascism is the present.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JimBeam · M
The national divorce needs to happen.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment