This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Legally you are completely wrong, as usual.
If doesn't matter what someone considers something, it matters what the law sees it as.
Such as if someone steals money, but they don't consider it stealing, that does not make it not stealing just because they didn't consider it stealing.
It matters what the law says, not what the people say.
If doesn't matter what someone considers something, it matters what the law sees it as.
Such as if someone steals money, but they don't consider it stealing, that does not make it not stealing just because they didn't consider it stealing.
It matters what the law says, not what the people say.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@sstronaut So anyone can make up laws anytime they wish, eh?
@sunsporter1649 No that's what you're falsely claiming, but that's false.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@sstronaut So ignoring statue of limitation laws and elevating misdameanors to felonies is fine in your book, eh?
@sunsporter1649 Now you're just changing the subject and trolling
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@sstronaut You telling me that some local attorney did not rewrite the statue of limitations clause, and elevate a bookkeeping error to a felony, did not do just that?