Stormie’s Attorney Confirmed That The $ From Donald Trump Was Not “Hush Money”

@MistyCee I think this is how sunstroke's 'reasoning' works.

Person A contracts with a grocery purchasing and delivery service (such as instacart). Service employee fulfills their end of the contract, delivers the goods. Person A classifies the contractual payment as a "legal expense"!!!

Sunstroke's mistake is pretending than any payments related to fulfillment of a contract are legal expenses🤣😂

@ElwoodBlues So non-disclosure agreements are illegal since when?

@sunsporter1649 Nope. Your mistake is pretending than any payments related to the fulfillment of a contract are legal expenses!

Purchasing groceries via contract is legal; classifying the cost of the groceries as a "legal expense" is fraudulent!!

What if I hired the nurse down the street to purchase my groceries? Could I classify my food costs as "medical expenses"??

@ElwoodBlues So legal contracts are not legal contracts?

@sunsporter1649 Purchasing groceries via contract is legal; classifying the cost of the groceries as a "legal expense" is fraudulent!!

What if I hired the nurse down the street to purchase my groceries? Could I classify my food costs as "medical expenses"??

@ElwoodBlues Ya know, now I get it. If it has consideration, its "legal" and thus, is a "legal expense."

And while you're Groceries might not be medical expenses, they could be legal ones.

@MistyCee Seriously? No Lib Soros-paid judge is dismissing a case against Trump. The appeals will exonerate Trump but they intend to convict...no matter what.

@ElwoodBlues So hiring an attorney to negotiate a contract and fulfill the obligations of said contract is illegal?

@MistyCee So if Instacart adjusted its contracts to read "consideration for ..." then we could all deduct our grocery expenses as "legal fees"? Somehow I doubt that would stand up in tax court.

@ElwoodBlues And the attorney that executed the contract with the distributor was paid a fee by the client to negotitate that contract, and many other contracts, sure sounds like legal expences to me

@TexChik Who did this, when, and is it on video?


I'm not disputing that it happened, mind you, but it sounds like it would be fun to watch.

@MistyCee There were two articles about it on Instagram; I read the headlines and kept scrolling. Didn't catch the prosecutor's name, just another corrupt puppy needing justice.

@MistyCee Wow, an "article" on Instagram LOL!!!

I like Tex Chk's imputation "just another corrupt puppy needing justice" that taking the 5th is effectively an admission of guilt🤣😂

Too bad the Chk from Tex blocks me and can't see this video of a person taking the 5th repeatedly.

[media=https://youtu.be/OAqjPXLTUMg?t=308]

@ElwoodBlues [media=https://youtu.be/d2dW_9Twyf4]

@sunsporter1649 Well, Pomerantz handled that well at least.

@MistyCee https://youtu.be/rDyODVzq1sY?si=wBdX00E3uA1sczCs

@TexChik Wow, he's a resume writer and a life coach.

@TexChik I missed it if he revealed any facts.

He did reiterate some and put a whole lot of spin on them, which I guess you could call explaining them.

I kind of lost interest when he talked about communist jurors, personally. He's obviously not a lawyer, but his website claims, among other things that he's a medical professional, which is mildly interesting.

The gotcha, though, with the 5th amendment, is pretty dumb, since whenever anyone asks you under oath, did you break the law, that's always the legally correct answer.

@MistyCee The legally correct answer for a lib lawyer. Again, your personal attacks on the source. That is so common. The actions of last year and this will be in legal textbooks for centuries to come about what happens when a lib prosecutor believes they have absolute power and are untouchable..