This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ElwoodBlues · M
I think part of the confusion is that there are multiple 'traditions' that identify themselves as conservative, and so the label becomes confusing.
For example, in Europe, self-identified conservatives support strict gun control, universal health care, and carbon reduction; very different from US conservatives.
Speaking of carbon reduction, are conservationists conservative? I would have thought so — the conservationist ethos derives from the basic conservative Edmund Burke principle that "we don't generally know what the heck we're doing, so making big changes in a system can be highly risky." But conservationists often find themselves opposed by other self described conservatives.
For example, in Europe, self-identified conservatives support strict gun control, universal health care, and carbon reduction; very different from US conservatives.
Speaking of carbon reduction, are conservationists conservative? I would have thought so — the conservationist ethos derives from the basic conservative Edmund Burke principle that "we don't generally know what the heck we're doing, so making big changes in a system can be highly risky." But conservationists often find themselves opposed by other self described conservatives.
@ElwoodBlues Most of the difference can just be explained by the fact that parties represent political ideologies, and when the main conservative or liberal party in a country changes on a topic that isn't strickly conservative or liberal, their voting block is influenced.
ElwoodBlues · M
@BRUUH I totally agree that political ideologies adopt names for whatever reason. But it still begs the question of what is meant by "traditional conservative." I think it's confusing if you don't define the phrase.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment