@BizSuitStacy True

@eli1601 I'm really more shocked about how blatant it seems than the fact that appellate court decisions can be political.

Say whatever you like about the district court judge, but he dotted his i's and crossed his t's.

This appellate decision, on it's surface at least, seems much more Trumpian in nature, made solely based on the outcome for Trump with no regard to facts, or consequences, including opening the door to every judgment debtor with an appeal to stall the process.

@MistyCee 😉 You never disappoint. A corrupt judge makes an obvious political decision based on his (and yours, of course) hatred of Trump and you call the appellate decision political.
Please, never change. 😆

@eli1601 There is no evidence the judge is corrupt. Your hatred is not evidence. If anything, he has bent over backward to give Trump the benefit of the doubt. The Court of Appeals made a clear political decision to also give Trump favorable treatment that isn't provided to the average citizen. The timing alone indicates that. If there was justification for their ruling, they would have provided it in their brief statement.

@MasterLee

Yep, I was thinking about $50K max myself. Something tells me things won't turn out well for these evil rats Arthur Engoron and Letitia James. Just like they've corrupted due process, they should be duly processed out by the law.

@PatKirby if murder is no bail, why for a clerical error case.

@beckyromero

Certain favored Americans don't have to post any bail at all.

@independentone It's a panel of five, apparently.

@MistyCee judges can be bought off pretty cheap, maybe a 100 grand each, or a new Mercedes or Tesla and they will find in your favor every time.

@independentone Teslas would be really interesting in this case.