Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

SCOTUS Takes Up the Trump Insurrection Ballot Ban Case

They're taking up the Colorado case - and their ruling will almost certainly apply to other state rulings as well (such as Maine).

What do I think SHOULD happen?

Trump should be barred from ever serving in federal office again.

What I think WILL happen? The Roberts Court has been pretty spineless. Remember how it decided ObamaCare? By twisting the meaning of the individual mandate as a "tax" instead of a requirement to purchase a product from a business.

So I believe that SCOTUS will avoid the Colorado ruling that the prohibition on holding federal office under the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment applies to the president and vice president (as "officeholders), as well as avoiding the Colorado ruling that Donald Trump did indeed take an oath to uphold the Constitution despite the word play defense his lawyers offered.

What they will do is allow Trump to remain on the ballot by saying Trump hasn't (yet) been convicted of insurrection (never mind that he gave support to those that did), perhaps kicking the can to Congress for that interpretation.

The Court knows there isn't time for such a criminal conviction of Trump to happen before the election and they know a divided Congress won't be able to do anything either.

Do they feel Trump is a danger to democracy? No doubt they do. But they will figure, like the Court did with ObamaCare, the next election will decide it, one way or the other, and make everything about Trump mute, one way or the other.

The problem with that is that if Trump were to win, it may be the LAST free election we will have.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Strictgram · 70-79, C
Only leftist fools use the word insurrection as no one, including Trump, have been so charged.
You mean moot not mute.
@Strictgram Doesn't matter. None of the former Confederates disqualified after the Civil War were charged with any crime. The amendment says "engaged" in insurrection, not "convicted" of it. It's self-executing, like the requirement that the president be over age 35. The only questions are whether Jan. 6 was an "insurrection" and whether Trump "engaged" in it.

Couy Griffin was convicted of trespassing for his role on Jan. 6, and he was disqualified under the insurrection clause of the 14th amendment. So there's already precedent for this.
Strictgram · 70-79, C
@LeopoldBloom Supreme Court will put the issue to bed.
@Strictgram Don't be so sure. They didn't help Traitor Tot out with his fake election fraud claims. The billionaires who own Thomas and Alito would be delighted if the court ruled against him.