Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

SCOTUS Takes Up the Trump Insurrection Ballot Ban Case

They're taking up the Colorado case - and their ruling will almost certainly apply to other state rulings as well (such as Maine).

What do I think SHOULD happen?

Trump should be barred from ever serving in federal office again.

What I think WILL happen? The Roberts Court has been pretty spineless. Remember how it decided ObamaCare? By twisting the meaning of the individual mandate as a "tax" instead of a requirement to purchase a product from a business.

So I believe that SCOTUS will avoid the Colorado ruling that the prohibition on holding federal office under the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment applies to the president and vice president (as "officeholders), as well as avoiding the Colorado ruling that Donald Trump did indeed take an oath to uphold the Constitution despite the word play defense his lawyers offered.

What they will do is allow Trump to remain on the ballot by saying Trump hasn't (yet) been convicted of insurrection (never mind that he gave support to those that did), perhaps kicking the can to Congress for that interpretation.

The Court knows there isn't time for such a criminal conviction of Trump to happen before the election and they know a divided Congress won't be able to do anything either.

Do they feel Trump is a danger to democracy? No doubt they do. But they will figure, like the Court did with ObamaCare, the next election will decide it, one way or the other, and make everything about Trump mute, one way or the other.

The problem with that is that if Trump were to win, it may be the LAST free election we will have.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Something I always loved about America is that our institutions were set up specifically so that our democracy couldn't be threatened. Sure, it was never perfect, but we continued making improvement consistently. Now I see that we didn't come nearly close enough. Trump is the archetype of a wannabe-dictator with full control of a major political party, who already tried to end democracy. He shouldn't be allowed to run for president again. And yet, he's going to be the nominee.
Strictgram · 70-79, C
@BohemianBabe Nonsense.
@Strictgram Who do you think it's gonna be? DeSantis?!
Strictgram · 70-79, C
@BohemianBabe Not nonsense he'll be the nominee. Nonsense he wants to be a dictator and shouldn't be allowed to run.
@Strictgram He said he wants to be a dictator on day one.
Are you saying Trump is lying? 😮
Strictgram · 70-79, C
Trump said he wanted to be a dictator for one day. To close the border and make the US energy dominant. Are you against that?
@Strictgram I'm against anyone being a "temporary dictator" because they never leave. This has been a super common thing throughout history. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, they all claimed they would temporarily crackdown so that they can fix the major problems, then we can all be free again. But nope, they all just remained dictators.
Also, Trump is obviously lying because he didn't close the border. Plus, America already produces more oil than any other country in the world. We're producing more oil under Biden than we were under Trump. If this issue is important to you, it makes more sense for you to vote Biden.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
OtkCouple · 41-45, C
@Strictgram You didn't address any of my points because you know you're wrong.
OtkCouple · 41-45, C
@Strictgram https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4z44XP4u9Xs