Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Threats to Colorado judges

Colorado justices get death threats after Trump disqualification https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12890061/This-ends-kill-f-ers-Colorado-Supreme-Court-justices-given-death-threats-disqualifying-Trump-ballot-Judges-targeted-warnings-beheaded-shot.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton

How many Trump supporters are actually murderous?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
You’re a fool. The SCOTUS will reverse that tomfoolery in a nanosecond. The tomfoolery is an attempt to take over this country without an election.
PatKirby · M
@jackjjackson

^Spot on^ The appeal was swiftly filed by Trump's team and the ruling is basically pending the outcome of the SCOTUS ruling.

Will they laugh it out of the courtroom, or possibly toss it out for lack of standing? Hmmm 🤔
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Have you read the Ed Meese Amicus brief files re Jack Smith’s disqualification. @PatKirby
PatKirby · M
@jackjjackson

Sounds interesting. Will review, can you summarize?
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Smith is not a federal employee as required by statute. Smith is a private citizen. In addition only presidents are able to appoint special prosecutors. @PatKirby
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
I didn’t even know Meese was still alive. 🤷🏽‍♂️ @PatKirby
PatKirby · M
@jackjjackson

After review yes Jack Smith, being a private citizen, clearly lacked any authority to represent the United States as his "appointment" was unconstitutional because Attorney General Merrick Garland “exceeded his statutory and constitutional authority.” Therefore since Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional every action he took since his appointment (i.e. request for certiorari) is null and void.

"Nor does he have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution. Those actions can be taken only by persons properly appointed as federal officers to properly created federal offices. Neither Smith nor the position of Special Counsel under which he purportedly acts meets those criteria."

He had no authority and the brief clearly spells it out in several ways. Therefore this begs the questions: knowing full well Smith did not have authority, why did they run with it anyway? It's a charade. Was it to orchestrate a dazzling spectacle on a national scale mimicking Hollywood theater? A mesmerizing dog-and-pony show to help their cause? For more votes? Because it's almost a dead certainty it won't pass muster before SCOTUS.

I do like the conclusion to the amicus which carries a tone of humorous discounting out of hand, and ergo I'm guessing it'll be thrown out for lack of standing straightaway...

CONCLUSION
Not clothed in the authority of the federal government, Smith is a modern example of the naked emperor. Improperly appointed, he has no more authority to represent the United States in this Court than Bryce Harper, Taylor Swift, or Jeff Bezos. That fact is sufficient to sink Smith’s petition, and the Court should deny review. We express no views on the merits issues addressed in Smith’s unauthorized petition.

These people are running a scam in hopes that the American public, the majority of which are legal babes in the woods, would never notice. Premeditated, for sure. Shameless, almost certain. Doomed to fail? You can smell blood in the water from here. But this is a good thing! It exposes the dishonest, deceptive, lying, maliciously vindictive nature underlying the Democratic Party/DNC while simultaneously boosting Trump's ratings, overall strength, patient strategic know how, and general attractiveness amongst the voting public at large. The Dems are playing checkers, Trump's playing...


Trump lives for this!
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Excellent analysis sir thank you. In the same spirit any of Bryce Harper, Taylor Swift, or Jeff Bezos would do a vastly superior job than Biden could dream of assuming he even has the capacity to do that. @PatKirby
PatKirby · M
@jackjjackson

Agreed with a guffaw! Taylor would swiftly delegate with brilliance compared to FJB. Bezos would probably catapult the nation into wealth. I do notice a pattern though. Each and every time they make a move to undermine Trump (indictments, false allegations, etc.), he grows stronger. So there is a method to the madness - stupidity, or its cousin idiocy.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Biden’s polling has been plummeting like a rock for at least a year. @PatKirby
PatKirby · M
@jackjjackson

As expected, and swiftly too...

"In a big victory for Trump, the Supreme Court tells Jack Smith to go away." - Vox
https://www.vox.com/scotus/2023/12/22/24012602/supreme-court-jack-smith-donald-trump-delay-election-theft-criminal-trial

"SCOTUS to Jack Smith: Nope" - Rolling Stone
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/scotus-supreme-court-declines-jack-smiths-ruling-presidential-immunity-1234935314/

"There were no dissents recorded from the decision not to hear the case at this time, nor did the justices provide any explanation for their decision." (SCOTUSblog)* So this indicates the decision was unanimous. So basically, SCOTUS told Smith to hit the road, without so much as a reason. 😂

* https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/12/court-wont-hear-trump-immunity-dispute-now/
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
It turned out exactly as reasonable thinking people predicted. The Meese bomb will explode on Smith another day 😂 so much the better! @PatKirby