Barring Trump

Lt. Gov: California must 'explore every legal option' to remove Trump https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12888585/california-lt-governor-remove-trump-ballot-2024-eleni-kounalakis.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton

Bet there are some angry protesters out there who support Trump who actually influenced many who followed him to try to overthrow the government. Now if that had been Kim jong-un!

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

TexChik · F

Red states will Bar Biden for violating federal law if he's not impeached first. Scotus will have to clean all that up. And in reality, this is only saber rattling. The corruption that has befallen California clearly started with their election process. California is a blue state. Individual votes count to determine who gets the state's electors, and only electoral votes determine who becomes president.

California will always be corrupt (and Blue), and therefore, omitting Trump from the ballot will only serve to disenfranchise a large portion of the voters. The state's electoral were already a wash and that despicable act does not affect Trump.

Virgo79 · 61-69, M

How to win, remove the competition

View 1 more replies »

Virgo79 · 61-69, M

@joe438 they don't have one😂

joe438 · 61-69, M

@Virgo79 Not that I can see, anyway. The talk is that Newsom is their rising star - but, Yikes!

Virgo79 · 61-69, M

@joe438 yea thzts scary, surely people has seen whay hes done, it's resent enough.

nudistsueaz · 61-69, F

Take away a choice from the people. 3rd world country tactic's!

joe438 · 61-69, M

@nudistsueaz if you know you can’t win legitimately then you do whatever you have to do.

HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M

The Supreme Court will put an end to this nonsense.

sstronaut

The Supreme Court has done a lot of kicking the can down the road ... and not actually ruling on the overall issue, but ruling on a minor one and sending it back to lower courts.

It's been kinda annoying to me, as you know the same question is going to be coming back to the court, if not this year, in 5 to 10 years.... why not just answer it now? Instead they change a minor fact and send it back down to the lower courts.

HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M

@sstronaut
Well there's a time pressure for this case that will prevent them from kicking the can down the road

sstronaut

Republicans has no chance of winning California, so I don't know why they would actually waste the time, money and resources to try to take him off the ballot...

Musicman · 61-69, M

@sstronaut While I agree with you if you let one state get away with it then others will follow. We need free elections. Not one side telling the country who they are "allowed" to vote for.

sstronaut

@Musicman Well [b][u]IF[/u][/b] someone is disqualified, then they're disqualified.

Such as say if a 32 year old runs for President, they're basically automatic disqualified as you need to be at least 35 years old I believe.

Musicman · 61-69, M

@sstronaut True, but you can't say we like Jim so Bob can't run against him. That isn't right.

smokingrapunzel · F

Daddy trump can happily fuck me

Add a comment...